My organization is absolutely not a WebSphere fan. They find it both too
heavy (computing resources) and too complex (people resources). JBoss is
both simpler and uses fewer resources. For Mark, these observations,
while believed to be true for the mainframe, are based upon our
experience on Intel and pSeries systems, and while I would like to say
that within 12 months we will be having JBoss used on Linux on the
mainframe, I can't say that plans are in place to make that happen in
this timeframe.
Harold Grovesteen
Adam Thornton wrote:
On Aug 28, 2007, at 2:45 PM, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
A second question, other than a cost issue, is there any thing you
would use Jboss for that wouldn't work just as well on Websphere?
Do you consider resource consumption "a cost issue" ?
Websphere tends to need more resources than JBoss, in my admittedly
anecdotal experience. If "cost" extends to "well, we can add some
more storage to the box" then that isn't a problem.
Adam
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390
or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
