It was upped in hopes to stay up without crashing in 24hours. Once IBM can figure out where the memory is going, we'll bring it back down to where it was (slowly).
Marcy Cortes "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation." -----Original Message----- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Thornton Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 1:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Another Linux swapping question On Oct 25, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Marcy Cortes wrote: > Sigh.. Looks like we still have a memory leak (native memory is what > WAS calls linux memory as opposed to memory in the heap). After > traffic picked up, swap continues to grow and cache is staying at > roughly 1G. > Back to the PMR... Seriously, if you have that much in cache, your guest is way too big. Regardless of what swap is doing. Adam ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
