Which is more important? Starfish or elephants? In other words .. why pick these 2 topics (UB and LSB) as something that needs choosing between? Sorry - I just don't get the connection, nor the need for a vendor to choose one over the other.
Scott On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 5:58 PM, John McKown <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 18:11, Scott Rohling wrote: > > I don't see a relationship... Isn't LSB about reducing differences > between > > different Linux distros? How does that relate to packaging binaries > with > > different architectures included? > > > > Scott > > I think Kirk was getting at the fact that only so many things can be > done. Which is of more use, Universal Binaries, or conformance to LSB? > Or maybe it is "which should we be pushing the Linux vendors for?" > > -- > John McKown > Maranatha! > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or > visit > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
