Depends on how granular you want to be, but I tend to go in 100 increments... helps make the math easier. At 200 you get twice as much access to resources as those at 100, at 1500, 15 times, etc. If that seems like too much of a jump (twice as much) -- then go fractional. 150 for 1.5 times the access, etc.
Scott Rohling On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Dean, David (I/S) <[email protected]>wrote: > Is there a rule of thumb on setting relative shares for zVM users? Default > has them at 100, we have increased important ones to 200. I noticed the > system users have very high shares, e.g. 1500. So, when you are > prioritizing, or de-prioritizing should you go in small incremental (25-50) > or larger (say 100, 200)? > > > David M. Dean > Information Systems > BlueCross BlueShield Tennnessee > > ----------------------------------------------------- > Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee > E-mail disclaimer: http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or > visit > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For more information on Linux on System z, visit > http://wiki.linuxvm.org/ > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
