On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Scott Rohling <[email protected]> wrote:
> Depends on how granular you want to be, but I tend to go in 100 > increments... helps make the math easier. At 200 you get twice as much > access to resources as those at 100, at 1500, 15 times, etc. If that seems > like too much of a jump (twice as much) -- then go fractional. 150 for 1.5 > times the access, etc. To double the relative share just so that your own math gets easier sounds pretty weird. And you're wrong about how it works. For most installations, CPU resources go to the users with the highest effective share. Only when they don't want any more, it goes to the next ones. Your best bet is to keep the share settings mostly in line with what the users need and don't try to do politics with it. See http://www.velocitysoftware.com/relshare.pdf The 1500 and 3000 as defaults are wrong. Don't follow that example. Rob ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
