> > Any particular reason for the different name? It seems like a gratuitous > change that really doesn't have any useful purpose. > > One reason is historical and the second, more important, is that s390utils is > collection of not only s390-tools but also other s390-related tools (cmsfs, > src_vipa, libzfcphbaapi and few other small > scripts/tools) and the previous maintainers wanted all of them in one > package.
How annoying. Wouldn't it have been easier to have meta-packages that just prereqed the appropriate other packages...? *sigh* It's just that this is one more thing to document that makes running in a mixed environment a PITA. OK, thanks. -- db
