David Boyes píše v Čt 15. 12. 2011 v 10:44 -0600: > > > Any particular reason for the different name? It seems like a gratuitous > > change that really doesn't have any useful purpose. > > > > One reason is historical and the second, more important, is that s390utils > > is > > collection of not only s390-tools but also other s390-related tools (cmsfs, > > src_vipa, libzfcphbaapi and few other small > > scripts/tools) and the previous maintainers wanted all of them in one > > package. > > How annoying. Wouldn't it have been easier to have meta-packages that just > prereqed the appropriate other packages...? *sigh* > It's just that this is one more thing to document that makes running in a > mixed environment a PITA.
on a system installed with standard installer you always have the base s390utils/s390-tools pre-installed (even all if I see correctly). I plan to move some stuff to own package(s) and at the end we could rename the remaining package back to s390-tools. Dan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
