On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:01:11 +0000 "Frank M. Ramaekers" <framaek...@ailife.com> wrote:
> Okay, I have a Fedora release 23 install. Everything work > great....well that's until I reboot (re-IPL). There is an > inconsistency in the initialization of the Ethernet interfaces: how the interface are configured? With static IPs or DHCP? Anything network or device related in the journal? Dan > > 1) Interfaces come up w/o an IP address (see enccw0.0600 and > enccw0.0700 ifconfig > enccw0.0.0600: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > ether 02:00:01:00:00:1f txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > enccw0.0.0700: flags=4097<UP,MULTICAST> mtu 1492 > ether 02:00:01:00:00:20 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host> > loop txqueuelen 1 (Local Loopback) > RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > virbr0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 192.168.122.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast > 192.168.122.255 ether 52:54:00:df:e7:ba txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > 2) One comes up (although w/o an IP address) and the other > doesn't come up at all ifconfig > enccw0.0.0700: flags=4097<UP,MULTICAST> mtu 1492 > ether 02:00:01:00:00:20 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host> > loop txqueuelen 1 (Local Loopback) > RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > virbr0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 192.168.122.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast > 192.168.122.255 ether 52:54:00:df:e7:ba txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > 3) Both interfaces come up normally: > ifconfig > enccw0.0.0600: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 4096 > inet 10.1.20.84 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 10.1.255.255 > inet6 fe80::1ff:fe00:1f prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > ether 02:00:01:00:00:1f txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 1542 bytes 182508 (178.2 KiB) > RX errors 0 dropped 98 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 46 bytes 4642 (4.5 KiB) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > enccw0.0.0700: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 4096 > inet 192.168.199.84 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast > 192.168.199.25 inet6 fe80::200:100:100:20 prefixlen 64 scopeid > 0x20<link> ether 02:00:01:00:00:20 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 26 bytes 2962 (2.8 KiB) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host> > loop txqueuelen 1 (Local Loopback) > RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > virbr0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 192.168.122.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast > 192.168.122.255 ether 52:54:00:df:e7:ba txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > I'm not seeing any differences in the startup messages, so I'm a bit > puzzled. (I also have a SUSE-SLES12 that doesn't experience this > behavior) > > TIA, > Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. | Systems Programmer | Information Technology > | American Income Life Insurance Company | 254-761-6649 (732-6649) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > This message contains information which is privileged and > confidential and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If > you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any review, > disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this > message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, > please destroy it immediately and notify us at > privacy...@torchmarkcorp.com. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 > or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For more information on Linux on System z, visit > http://wiki.linuxvm.org/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/