On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote: > Okay, I have a Fedora release 23 install. Everything work > great....well that's until I reboot (re-IPL). There is an > inconsistency in the initialization of the Ethernet > interfaces:
> 3) Both interfaces come up normally: > ifconfig > enccw0.0.0600: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 4096 > inet 10.1.20.84 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 10.1.255.255 > RX packets 1542 bytes 182508 (178.2 KiB) > RX errors 0 dropped 98 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 46 bytes 4642 (4.5 KiB) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > enccw0.0.0700: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 4096 > inet 192.168.199.84 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.199.25 > RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 26 bytes 2962 (2.8 KiB) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > I'm not seeing any differences in the startup messages, so I'm a bit puzzled. > (I also have a SUSE-SLES12 that doesn't experience this behavior) Case 3 has a very high 'drop' rate, when none would be expected on '0600'; and no RX packets (no arp, no replies -- nothing) on '0700' That kind of jumps out at me, and in a physical network, I would expect that the patch-bay was not properly plugged in. Dunno here -- Russ herrold ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
