On Nov 17, 2017, at 4:45 PM, Alan Altmark wrote: > It might, however, be an interesting idea to make the ioctl()s in the > device driver a no-op instead of not being present or generating its own > errnos. That way folks can turn the knob, feel better, but not see any > change since "it doesn't get any better than this".
I feel like this would violate the principle of least-surprise. ok bear. -- until further notice ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
