On 05/25/2018 06:11 PM, Michael MacIsaac wrote:
> Hello lists,

If cross-posted, this is not a multi-list reply, for better or worse.


> I stumbled onto the first "Read-only root" paper that the guys from
> Nationwide basically wrote. While on the Redbooks website, I was surprised
> to be asked if I wanted to chat about it. I said yes, and tried to be
> respectful. Below is the chat text, which in the Turing Test, I would vote
> yes, that was a live sapien (perhaps I failed?).

I was there. Want more of the story? Should probably also ask JSV and
RRHB. (If they're on this list, they're primarily in lurk mode. I know
they both have full plates.)

The book describes the popular recipe of that time in excruciating
detail. Coulda, woulda, shoulda been simpler. (But I do not fault those
whose names are on the Redbook for the complexity. It's almost
impossible to draw in such a wide and varied audience and accommodate
all of their reqs.)

I'll cobble-up a blog post with the details rather than clutter mailboxes.


> I look back and now reflect - are Containers and Docker the new "read-only
> root"? Is mainframe playing catch-up 10 years later?  Can we somehow lead?
> Just some questions for thought ...

Shared disk, shared memory, shared filesystems, oh my!

Read-only ROOT turned out to be unpopular (at Nationwide). Read-only
SYSTEM would have been better, and can be demonstrated to work well. But
there's so little tolerance for anything foreign in mainstream
system/package/container management that few bother. I know one group in
Ohio that got serious about shared root (not R/O in their case, so they
used NFS for it).


> IBM Sales Rep
> Hello! My name is Taylor. Welcome to IBM Live Chat – Sales. How may I help
> you today?
> Me on May 25, 5:29 PM
> Hi, is this paper still relevant? It is more than 10 years old
> Taylor on May 25, 5:30 PM
> What paper are you referring to?
> Me on May 25, 5:30 PM
> Sharing and maintaining Linux under z/VM
> Me on May 25, 5:31 PM
> The Web page I am on
> Taylor on May 25, 5:31 PM
> I'm not able to see what you're looking at, could you send me the URL?
> Me on May 25, 5:31 PM
> http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/redp4322.html
> Taylor on May 25, 5:31 PM
> Thanks! Let me take a look
> Taylor on May 25, 5:33 PM
> Parts of it will still be relevant, but as you said, with it being 10 years
> old...some concepts will be dated
> Me on May 25, 5:33 PM
> OK, thanks
> Taylor on May 25, 5:33 PM
> Absolutely. Is there anything else I can help you with?
> Me on May 25, 5:34 PM
> No, you've been very helpful, thanks
> Taylor on May 25, 5:34 PM
> My pleasure, I hope you have a wonderful day!

Doesn't *sound* like a synth. But you were chatting with the company
which owns Watson. Gotta wonder.

-- R; <><






----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/

Reply via email to