Implementing DLm with VM:Tape is fairly easy. Does not use DFSMSrmm. I set it up several years ago at UnitedHealth/Optum. No longer have access. 😊
I passed on doc to Rick Barlow several months ago, so he may be able to share his experience. ________________________________ From: Linux on 390 Port <[email protected]> on behalf of David Boyes <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 9:10 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Any success stories using EMC DLm's with z/VM and Linux? Haven’t done it myself, so just speculating, but: Do you have a tape manager, like VM:Tape? Standalone it’s pretty grim, but it might work better if you were able to manage it via that route. The CA folks are used to weird tape configurations, and since they go through the DFSMSrmm interface to get media moved, it would seem that it would work in that you could get the device working via RMM as a different library name and then go through the process in the VM:Tape guide for mass moves to different type of media. It’s more of a PITA for unlabeled tapes, but you’d have to do those by hand anyway. Any of those VSS thingies really really don’t like unlabeled volumes. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
