On Thursday, 07/26/2018 at 01:45 GMT, "Feller, Paul" <paul.fel...@transamerica.com> wrote:
> <several dozen more I/O errors> I'm thinking along the same lines as Mike. If this is a synchronous mirror, something seems wrong. Is it really a synchronous mirror primary? It's sort of acting like an as-yet-unpopulated flashcopy target, which is inappropriate for a cloning operation (IMO). There is no such thing as I/O errors ever being "ok" in any sense of the word during a copy operation. "Detected capacity change"? A capacity change event is driven by hardware and it's not something you expect to see during a copy. (Assuming Linux isn't mis-reporting the event.) Alan Altmark Senior Managing z/VM and Linux Consultant IBM Systems Lab Services IBM Z Delivery Practice ibm.com/systems/services/labservices office: 607.429.3323 mobile; 607.321.7556 alan_altm...@us.ibm.com IBM Endicott ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
