On 7/22/20 9:28 AM, Stefan Raspl wrote: > qclib, which was linked to earlier in the thread, offers all the info.
Indeed, which is what I would have based anything I wrote on. -snip- > It seems like there's a use for most of the data provided by qc_test, > everybody > seems to find interest in some data. So I'm contemplating externalization of > qc_test output in some shape or form - but is that really consumable? Not as is, today. > However, externalizing it is easier said than done, since some of the fields > require a lot of explanation, especially in virtualized environments. > So: Would the output below help, or should we rather have a separate tool > with a > more comprehensible format? The latter. Please let me know if you're going to proceed with this. If so, I won't start working on the limited command I already talked about. Thanks, Mark Post ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www2.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
