Re: bcc under ELKS?

[David Murn]

On Wed, 2 Dec 1998, Eric J. Korpela wrote:

> But it's barely functional under 640K.  If fact I seem to remember not
> being able to compile it in 640K.

fwiw, I've compiled it in 512k.

> Anyone know how much of cc1 is libc?  Maybe it's time for shared libraries?

The big problem isn't so much the binary, but the amount of RAM it needs
at runtime.  From memory, it chews up several hundred k of ram.

Davey