On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Shane Kerr wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Steve Drake wrote: > > > The reason I can see for ELKS is what first lead me to take an interest > > in it -- the "E" in ELKS stands for "Embeddable." > > For those looking for a free, open source, embeddable OS, check out: > > http://www.cygnus.com/ecos/ > > It does require a 32-bit (or 64-bit) processor, but AFAIK that's not a big > deal for real embedded projects. > > ELKS is for funzies. You can always make an 8086 smaller than 32 bit prcrs., plus it's a known design. I have no problem figuring ELKS running on a wristwatch. Jakob
- Re: kernel fission was: msdos/umsdos support... Chipzz
- Re: kernel fission was: msdos/umsdos sup... Shane Kerr
- Re: kernel fission was: msdos/umsdos... Steve Drake
- Re: kernel fission was: msdos/um... Shane Kerr
- Re: kernel fission was: msd... David Given
- Re: kernel fission was:... ror4
- Re: kernel fission was:... David C.S. Prior
- Re: kernel fission was:... Shane Kerr
- Re: kernel fission was:... David Given
- RE: kernel fission was:... Rod Boyce
- Re: kernel fission was: msd... Jakob Eriksson
- Re: kernel fission was: msdos/umsdos... Dan Olson
- Re: kernel fission was: msdos/um... David Murn
- RE: kernel fission was: msdos/umsdos support? Paul Roberts
- Re: kernel fission was: msdos/umsdos support? 金昌理
- Re: kernel fission was: msdos/umsdos support... Jakob Eriksson
- Re: kernel fission was: msdos/umsdos support? Alistair Riddoch
