> I seriously doubt it will ever happen. > 1. Not enough CPU power > 2. Not enough memory space > 3. Goto 1 We've had this discussion not too long ago. Early versions of PC-Xview would run in 640K (but still claim to need a 286. Still haven't gotten around to trying it on my V30 machine.) Early version of PC-Xview for Windows would run under Win 3.0 in Standard Mode on a 286 with a couple MB. If you can do it under windows, you can certainly do it under a real operating system. > About the lowest platform I would consider X on is a 386-DX-25 or so > with at least 16 MB of memory running a tiny mono X server or something > like that. I don't suppose you ever used X on an 8 MHz 68010 (like early Sun machines). I wonder if it's still possible to get X10 or X11R<3 source code anywhere. X wasn't always as bloated as it is now. Eric
- Re: will it eventually run X Matthew London
- Re: will it eventually run X Ken Yap
- Re: will it eventually run X Jonathan Hall
- Re: will it eventually run X Shawn T. Rutledge
- Re: will it eventually run X Angel Martin Alganza
- Re: will it eventually run X Shawn T. Rutledge
- Re: will it eventually run X Angel Martin Alganza
- Re: will it eventually run ... Shawn T. Rutledge
- Re: will it eventually run X Jonathan Hall
- Re: will it eventually run X Dan Olson
- Re: will it eventually run X Eric J. Korpela
- Re: will it eventually run X Andru Luvisi
- Re: will it eventually run X Ken Yap
- Re: will it eventually run X Ken Yap
- Re: will it eventually run X Phil Kos
- Re: will it eventually run X JueyChong Ong
- Re: will it eventually run X Ken Yap
- Re: will it eventually run X Larry Howard Mittman
- Re: will it eventually run X Ken Yap
- Re: will it eventually run X Brian D Chase
