> o MSDOS driver support. I wrote a 640x480x16 color driver in about 45 minutes.
>NanoX now runs on DOS! (OK, I did this only to see how portable nanoX
>is, and the
>mouse driver still isn't written) This still uses MSC graphics library.
>I'll have the bios
>int10 version driver done shortly, which will allow nanoX to run on
>ELKS! We should
>have an ELKS version shortly... BTW, the nanoX kernel is around 20k on DOS...
Does anyone else agree with me that direct int 10 access is a mistake?
Wouldn't access through a device driver be a bit more unixy? It would
be able to prevent multiple processes from trying to access int 10 services.
Eric
