> Does anyone else agree with me that direct int 10 access is a mistake? Yes > Wouldn't access through a device driver be a bit more unixy? It would > be able to prevent multiple processes from trying to access int 10 services. You need to fix and recover context, you need to worry about 286 protected mode etc. The driver in the kernel may well use int10 tho 8)
- NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Louis P. Santillan
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Hans-Joachim Baader
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Eric J. Korpela
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Luke (boo) Farrar
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Louis P. Santillan
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Alistair Riddoch
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Shane Kerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Alan Cox
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Ross Vandegrift
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Eric J. Korpela
- Re: NanoX version 0.3 released Alistair Riddoch
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Greg Haerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released Shane Kerr
- RE: NanoX version 0.3 released David Murn
