>> Best not to get into a debate about >> it here, but I remain firmly in the vi camp. [Al] > >You'd actually use an editor like that for word processing? [Thor] Hell no. Text editors are *not* word processors. Don't confuse the two. Pedantics aside, I also feel comfortable with vi, although ed is pretty good (it's the system editor! ;). I prefer emacs as an environment but for banging out a text file, either vi or ed will do just fine. - phil
- Editor Thor Harald Johansen
- Re: Editor Alistair Riddoch
- SV: Editor Thor Harald Johansen
- Re: SV: Editor Alistair Riddoch
- Re: Editor Dustin Lang
- RE: Editor Simon Wood
- SV: Editor Thor Harald Johansen
- Re: SV: Editor Alan Cox
- RE: Editor Greg Haerr
- RE: Editor Phil Kos
- RE: Editor Gray, David W.
- SV: Editor Thor Harald Johansen
- RE: Editor Gray, David W.
