On Mon, 4 Oct 1999 19:49:11 +0100 (BST) you wrote: >> I thought we'd already agreed on the MPL as a decent common denominator, >> but I'd have no problems with dual licensing the code under both *GPL >> and MPL. > >I still personally think the MPL is the only standard license that fits >the linked in case at all I agree, but on the other hand I'd gladly support licensing the code under both the GPL and the MPL, so that those who wants to develop free software can do so and still use other GPL'd software in their programs. Regards, Vidar
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Alan Cox
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Bradley D. LaRonde
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Alex Holden
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Bradley D. LaRonde
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindow... Alex Holden
- Re: Request for comments - Microw... Bradley D. LaRonde
- Re: Request for comments - Mi... Alex Holden
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Alex Holden
- RE: Request for comments - Microwindows Greg Haerr
- Re: Stupid licensing thread (Was: Request for comments ... Vidar Hokstad
- RE: Request for comments - Microwindows Greg Haerr
- RE: Request for comments - Microwindows Vidar Hokstad
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Vidar Hokstad
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Bradley D. LaRonde
- RE: Request for comments - Microwindows Vidar Hokstad
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Vidar Hokstad
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Bradley D. LaRonde
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Vidar Hokstad
