Re: Request for comments - Microwindows

[Alan Cox]

> The problem, as you've noted, is that many would want to link the server
> into their applications. I know that we (Screen Media) can't continue to
> work on it if the code isn't available under another license (apart from
> the *GPL's) as well, and the result would be yet another code split.

Nod.

> I thought we'd already agreed on the MPL as a decent common denominator,
> but I'd have no problems with dual licensing the code under both *GPL
> and MPL.

I still personally think the MPL is the only standard license that fits
the linked in case at all