"DeWitt, Michael" wrote: > > I am pretty sure I compiled and set up lm_sensors as modules and didn't > have to patch anything. It seemed to work and report accurately > (relative to the BIOS). > > Why is patching preferable? > > Mike IIRC, it adds support for the I2C bus to the kernel. Mordy -- o Mordy Ovits o Cryptographic Engineer o LockStar, Inc. -- There are two kinds of fool; One who says "This is old and therefore bad," and one who says "This is new and therefore better." -- John Brunner -- =- To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the -= =- body of "unsubscribe linux-abit". -=
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] i2c, smbus, lm_sensors Daniel Smolik
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] i2c, smbus, lm_sensors Paolo Nenzi
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] i2c, smbus, lm_sensors Daniel Smolik
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] i2c, smbus, lm_sensors Paolo Nenzi
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] i2c, smbus, lm_sensors Miroslav Petricek
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] i2c, smbus, lm_sensors James T Perkins
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] i2c, smbus, lm_sensors Kurt Watkins
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] i2c, smbus, lm_sensors Edward Schernau
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] i2c, smbus, lm_sensors Tim Angus
- RE: [LINUX-ABIT] i2c, smbus, lm_sensors DeWitt, Michael
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] i2c, smbus, lm_sensors Mordy Ovits
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] i2c, smbus, lm_sensors Daniel Moran
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] i2c, smbus, lm_sensors Eric Eastman