>
> I see people on the list say things like "it falls over straight away at 107MHz,
> but its rock solid at 106MHz". That's BS. A small change in room temperature could
> make that one fall over. You want to include data like this in some statistics? If
> they say "its falls over at 107MHz, so I backed off 10%" maybe that data is worth
> using.
>
Well, I must have a large bovine in my basement then...
At 108MHz FSB I run solid. (Setiathomes, X, kernal loops, etc. running for
days). At 110MHz FSB I lock up in under 30 minutes. Given a greater than
100:1 ratio in run times, I suspect the FSB change of "only" 2 MHz is
significant (I emphasize "only" since the difference between the original
4.77MHhz XT and the first 6MHz AT was a meer 1.23MHz, but I'm dateing myself).
--
Kevin Carpenter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kevin's Home Page: http://www.monrou.com/kevinc
(Expressing his comments from home in St. Louis, where this message originated)
--
=- To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the -=
=- body of "unsubscribe linux-abit". -=
