On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 11:06:58AM -0500, James Manning wrote:
> if it turns out to be noapic, can we talk you into trying before/after
> comparisons with and w/o QQ bios? :)
Seconded. I'll broaden the request and ask if ANYONE who's having stability
problems could upgrade to QQ and see what happens. For me at least, I've
been going for a day and a half now with no APIC errors or crashes with a
2.3 kernel so I'm hoping this is The Fix. (Previously when running seti
with a 2.3 kernel, I would get a lockup in a matter of hours) People who
are still getting APIC errors with QQ - can you confirm that the flash went
through OK? You should have a warning at the bootup screen (ie when it's
counting memory, etc) about the BIOS not being intended for resale. I had a
problem with the flash program before which makes me wonder if it sometimes
doesn't behave like it should...
--
+------- --- -- -- -
|My opinions are those of snurgle.org, not Oracle / [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
!http://www.snurgle.org/~griffon/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
- -- -- --- -------+
--
=- To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the -=
=- body of "unsubscribe linux-abit". -=
