Brown, Len wrote: > > > >>2) acpi-cpufreq does not load either, returns ENODEV too. It's probably >>git-acpi. I tried to revert it but there are lots of other patches >>depending on it, so I finally gave up. >> >> > >Brice, >Can you try the converse? >Apply the acpi patch (which is included in -mm) >without the rest of the mm tree to see if that broke acpi-cpufreq?: > >http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/patches/test/2.6.15/acpi-test-20051216-2.6.15.diff.bz2 > >thanks, >-Len > >
Len, This patch applied on top of 2.6.15 breaks acpi-cpufreq in the same way. Brice - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
