Hi, I've got 4 new ACPI errors during the boot sequence:
ACPI: Subsystem revision 20060113 ACPI: Interpreter enabled ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing ACPI Error (nsxfeval-0240): Handle is NULL and Pathname is relative ACPI Error (nsxfeval-0240): Handle is NULL and Pathname is relative ACPI Error (nsxfeval-0240): Handle is NULL and Pathname is relative ACPI Error (nsxfeval-0240): Handle is NULL and Pathname is relative ... After some investigations it appears that the corresponding Pathname are _PR0, _PR1, _PR2 and _PR3 and are concerning the root node. There is no _PRx in my dsdt so this error has probably always existed but has been made visible by the switch from ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT to ACPI_REPORT_ERROR in the latest ACPI patch. Is this a real error ? Is it OK for my dsdt to lack these _PRx objects ? Thanks (this has already been reported some time ago: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=112429158821875&w=2) (Please CC me) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
