On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:39:00 -0300 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Len Brown wrote: > > > +config ACPI_IBM_BAY > > > > Should this depend on ACPI_BAY=n? > > It should allow both as modules, so that the user can choose which one to > run. Doesn't this option enable support for controlling the bay device via ibm_acpi? If so - if you compile this one, then the user who chooses to use bay.ko instead to control the bay can not use ibm_acpi at all to control the remaining functionality. I feel this should be dependent on ACPI_BAY=n. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
