On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:55:06 -0300 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note that these are all just stop-gap measures. We either need to have > ACPI_BAY do everything needed in ThinkPads (like handling bay batteries), or > to make both drivers work together, or I'll just pull all the ACPI_BAY > functionality into ibm-acpi (and then I will definately conflict with > ACPI_BAY). I think we should focus our efforts on a generic (non platform specific) solution that can work across many laptops (i.e. ACPI_BAY). Let's make the bay driver do what it should - I've got a stack of modules for Dell module bays we can check against too - and I believe that Dell also supports charging the battery in the module bay. I am happy to take patches to the bay driver, and am also happy to help develop them. I don't have handling content of bay changes on my radar at the moment, so if you do have time to work on this, that would be great. I am happy to test on the set of laptops I've got. Thanks, Kristen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
