On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:09:47PM -0700, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
>
>
> Ooops. Sent the wrong/old version of the patch.
> Len - Please do not apply this I will send a new one.
>
> Thanks,
> Venki
>
Below is the proper patch I wanted to send earlier.
Thanks,
Venki
Check both pm2_control_block and cpm2_control_block for bm_control. It should
be better to do this with checking of address from consolidated
fadt_info_table[]. But, that will need some changes in acpica tables.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc-mm/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22-rc-mm.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c 2007-06-07
11:33:00.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc-mm/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c 2007-06-08
14:26:32.000000000 -0700
@@ -524,8 +524,15 @@
/*
* Check to see if we have bus mastering arbitration control. This
* is required for proper C3 usage (to maintain cache coherency).
+ * Check both pm2_control_block and xpm2_control_block
*/
- if (acpi_gbl_FADT.pm2_control_block &&
acpi_gbl_FADT.pm2_control_length) {
+ if ((acpi_gbl_FADT.header.revision >= FADT2_REVISION_ID &&
+ acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm2_control_block.space_id ==
+ ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO &&
+ acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm2_control_block.address &&
+ acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm2_control_block.bit_width) ||
+ (acpi_gbl_FADT.pm2_control_block &&
+ acpi_gbl_FADT.pm2_control_length)) {
pr->flags.bm_control = 1;
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
"Bus mastering arbitration control
present\n"));
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
