On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 01:04 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 3 of January 2008, Shaohua Li wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 22:05 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > > ACPI defines a hardware signature. BIOS calculates the signature
> > > > according to hardware configure, if hardware changes, the
> signature
> > > will
> > > > change, in this case, S4 resume should fail.
> > >
> > > The idea is fine, but I'd prefer to do that in a more
> straightforward
> > > way.
> > > Namely, we can just:
> > > * write the signature into a variable in, for example,
> > >   acpi_hibernation_prepare() (then, the "old" signature value will
> be
> > >   automatically saved in the image)
> > > * compare it with a the "new" value read from the BIOS in
> > >   acpi_hibernation_leave() and panic if there's a mismatch
> > > * add a configuration option to disable this behavior (just in
> case)
> > > This way we can avoid modifying the entire generic interface to
> add
> > > the feature
> > > specific to ACPI.
> > it would be better we do the check in boot kernel.
> Franky, I think we should also check in the image kernel, in case the
> boot
> one doesn't support ACPI as I said.
Ok, makes sense. I changed to check the signature in .higberation_leave

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

Index: linux/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c        2008-01-03 13:37:08.000000000 
+0800
+++ linux/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c     2008-01-04 13:36:10.000000000 +0800
@@ -256,6 +256,17 @@ static int acpi_hibernation_enter(void)
        return ACPI_SUCCESS(status) ? 0 : -EFAULT;
 }
 
+static unsigned long s4_hardware_signature;
+static struct acpi_table_facs *facs;
+static int nosigcheck;
+
+static int __init acpi_s4_nosigcheck(char *str)
+{
+       nosigcheck = 1;
+       return 1;
+}
+__setup("acpi_s4_nosigcheck", acpi_s4_nosigcheck);
+
 static void acpi_hibernation_leave(void)
 {
        /*
@@ -263,6 +274,11 @@ static void acpi_hibernation_leave(void)
         * enable it here.
         */
        acpi_enable();
+       if (facs && s4_hardware_signature != facs->hardware_signature) {
+               printk(KERN_EMERG"PM: Hardware changed in the S4 circle, can't 
resume\n");
+               if (!nosigcheck)
+                       panic("S4 resume error");
+       }
 }
 
 static void acpi_hibernation_finish(void)
@@ -449,6 +465,10 @@ int __init acpi_sleep_init(void)
                sleep_states[ACPI_STATE_S4] = 1;
                printk(" S4");
        }
+       acpi_get_table_by_index(ACPI_TABLE_INDEX_FACS,
+               (struct acpi_table_header **)&facs);
+       if (facs)
+               s4_hardware_signature = facs->hardware_signature;
 #endif
        status = acpi_get_sleep_type_data(ACPI_STATE_S5, &type_a, &type_b);
        if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to