On Friday, 4 of January 2008, Shaohua Li wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 01:04 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 3 of January 2008, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 22:05 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > > > ACPI defines a hardware signature. BIOS calculates the signature
> > > > > according to hardware configure, if hardware changes, the
> > signature
> > > > will
> > > > > change, in this case, S4 resume should fail.
> > > >
> > > > The idea is fine, but I'd prefer to do that in a more
> > straightforward
> > > > way.
> > > > Namely, we can just:
> > > > * write the signature into a variable in, for example,
> > > > acpi_hibernation_prepare() (then, the "old" signature value will
> > be
> > > > automatically saved in the image)
> > > > * compare it with a the "new" value read from the BIOS in
> > > > acpi_hibernation_leave() and panic if there's a mismatch
> > > > * add a configuration option to disable this behavior (just in
> > case)
> > > > This way we can avoid modifying the entire generic interface to
> > add
> > > > the feature
> > > > specific to ACPI.
> > > it would be better we do the check in boot kernel.
> > Franky, I think we should also check in the image kernel, in case the
> > boot
> > one doesn't support ACPI as I said.
> Ok, makes sense. I changed to check the signature in .higberation_leave
Thanks, comments below.
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c 2008-01-03 13:37:08.000000000
> +0800
> +++ linux/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c 2008-01-04 13:36:10.000000000 +0800
> @@ -256,6 +256,17 @@ static int acpi_hibernation_enter(void)
> return ACPI_SUCCESS(status) ? 0 : -EFAULT;
> }
>
> +static unsigned long s4_hardware_signature;
> +static struct acpi_table_facs *facs;
> +static int nosigcheck;
Use bool perhaps?
> +
> +static int __init acpi_s4_nosigcheck(char *str)
> +{
> + nosigcheck = 1;
And "true" here?
> + return 1;
> +}
> +__setup("acpi_s4_nosigcheck", acpi_s4_nosigcheck);
> +
Please put this function at the end of the file. Also, I'd call it
"acpi_s4_nosig", but whatever.
> static void acpi_hibernation_leave(void)
> {
> /*
> @@ -263,6 +274,11 @@ static void acpi_hibernation_leave(void)
> * enable it here.
> */
> acpi_enable();
> + if (facs && s4_hardware_signature != facs->hardware_signature) {
I think we don't need to evaluate the condition if nosigcheck is true, but ...
> + printk(KERN_EMERG"PM: Hardware changed in the S4 circle, can't
> resume\n");
> + if (!nosigcheck)
> + panic("S4 resume error");
> + }
> }
>
> static void acpi_hibernation_finish(void)
> @@ -449,6 +465,10 @@ int __init acpi_sleep_init(void)
> sleep_states[ACPI_STATE_S4] = 1;
> printk(" S4");
> }
... I'd put "if (!nosigcheck)" around the following 4 lines and then we
wouldn't need to check nosigcheck in acpi_hibernation_leave(), because facs
would be NULL.
Also, please put that into the block that contains the 'printk(" S4")' above.
> + acpi_get_table_by_index(ACPI_TABLE_INDEX_FACS,
> + (struct acpi_table_header **)&facs);
> + if (facs)
> + s4_hardware_signature = facs->hardware_signature;
> #endif
> status = acpi_get_sleep_type_data(ACPI_STATE_S5, &type_a, &type_b);
> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
