Linux-Advocacy Digest #644, Volume #27 Thu, 13 Jul 00 11:13:04 EDT
Contents:
Re: LINUX NFS SUX !!! ("ne...")
Re: apache_server config (Joachim Feise)
Re: Linux is blamed for users trolling-wish. (Nathaniel Jay Lee)
Re: I had a reality check today :( ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
RE: apache_server config ("greenplasticman")
Re: Growing dependence on Java (Nathaniel Jay Lee)
Re: To Pete Goodwin: How Linux saved my lunch today! (Nathaniel Jay Lee)
Re: What happens when all the bit twiddlers are gone? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: C# is a copy of java ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: C# is a copy of java ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Linux lags behind Windows ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Linux lags behind Windows ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Linux lags behind Windows ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Linux lags behind Windows ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "ne..." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: LINUX NFS SUX !!!
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:58:08 GMT
On Jul 13, 2000 at 13:45, Donovan Rebbechi eloquently wrote:
>On Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:28:20 GMT, ne... wrote:
>>On Jul 13, 2000 at 12:18, Donovan Rebbechi eloquently wrote:
>>
>>Now you of all people should know that this is the
>>wrong group to ask such questons in. C.o.l.setup or
>>c.o.l.networking would be much better.
>
>I tried a help group and didn't get a response.
Prepare to be flamed... sorry I can't help you tho.
--
Registered Linux User # 125653
Don't know what time I'll be back, Mom. Probably soon after she throws me out.
9:57am up 3 days, 13:09, 8 users, load average: 0.03, 0.02, 0.00
------------------------------
From: Joachim Feise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: apache_server config
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 06:55:03 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone
>
> i recently installed redhat Linux 6.2 with squid and Apache server ver
> 1.3.12.
> From windows Pc i am unable to connect to Apache web server ,it is not
> even showing "It worked". I am wetting error message "403 forbidden you
> dont have permission to access on this server.
This usually means that the permissions on the htdocs directory are wrong.
Do a chmod o+x on the directory.
-Joe
------------------------------
From: Nathaniel Jay Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.sad-people.microsoft.lovers,alt.destroy.microsoft
Subject: Re: Linux is blamed for users trolling-wish.
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 09:02:18 -0500
"T. Max Devlin" wrote:
>
> Quoting Nathaniel Jay Lee from comp.os.linux.advocacy; Tue, 11 Jul 2000
> >[...]Someone says that it
> >isn't possible to make an MS OS run with any stability, and I will say
> >it is possible, but not common. If that makes me an MS supporter in
> >your eyes, well, whatever. Personally I'm sick of MS and the crappy
> >software that I constantly have to support (where-ever I work I get to
> >support some idiot visitors laptop, or some dumbass calling me up
> >telling me that he does business with my company, therefore I owe him,
> >I'm in a wood working business for god sakes). I want MS to die just as
> >much as the next guy, but I'm not going to bullshit my way through life.
>
> Well, maybe this will help you see why what you might think of as
> badgering on my part is really just trying to be helpful. Based on the
> conceptual glitch I see in your thinking, I'd say it is quite possible
> that you will find, should MS dry up and blow away any time soon, that
> your problems will remain essentially unchanged. You will still be
> frustrated by having to support crappy software. Because the problem
> isn't necessarily that MS writes crappy software. The problem is a
> conceptual glitch on our brains' part.
>
> The problem is that "it is possible, but not common" for an OS to be
> stable, this implies, whether you want it to or not, that the uncommon
> occurrences are purposeful and deterministic. If, as I've said, this is
> not the case, and which systems will run stably and which will not
> cannot be predicted or empirically designated, then the phrase is not
> accurate. It would be appropriate, under those circumstances, for what
> you intended to mean to be expressed 'it is possible, but unlikely'.
>
> And I submit that if you don't believe the difference is important, then
> it is likely that your common experience with any other consumer OS will
> be very similar to the problems you're having now. Just because Windows
> is crappy software doesn't mean it is responsible for all of your
> problems.
I guess the conceptual glitch in my head doesn't apply to Unix like OSes
because at my current job (in the aforementioned Wood Working company) I
run all Unix systems and don't have near the trouble that I had with
Windows. And as far as blaming others goes, I can't. This was my baby
from the start, and on the few moments where things have gone wrong, I
quickly and quietly go about fixing the problem. I consider myself a
fairly good troubleshooter. Especially on Unix like OSes where I know I
can fix it and it will stay fixed. So, since you think I will have huge
problems with any OS, then I assume that this is a fixation on your
ability to use words better than me.
I don't know, the two phrases "it is possible, but not common" and "it
is common, but unlikely" look extremely similar to me. After all
unlikely means that it isn't common. This really seems to be a focus
more on our abilities to build phrases with words in exactly the way you
do. So, instead of attacking my abilities to troubleshoot, my abilities
to administer systems, and my abilities to take blame when I screw up
(which I do at times), why don't we focus on what the real problem is:
My inability to get my brain to say things exactly the way you say
them. After all, that seems to be all you are after. You just want me
to say things with the exact same words and exact same phrases that you
would use. And then when I don't you use that as an excuse to say there
is a glitch in my brain. If this isn't what the problem is, well
sorry. I fail to see what your point it if this isn't it. And since
you obviously are too intelligent to tell me what your point is, then I
will assume that this conversation is pointless and a waste of time.
Enjoy your life. I harbor no ill-will towards you. I just wonder where
the hell this all came from.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nathaniel Jay Lee
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: I had a reality check today :(
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 10:12:15 -0400
Tim Palmer wrote:
>
> On 8 Jul 2000 07:20:33 GMT, Ray Chason
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Tim Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>On 6 Jul 2000 03:40:57 GMT, Ray Chason
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>Tim Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>It won't healp LIE-nux anny. Nobuddy want's to reed HOWTO after HOWTO after
>HOWTO. You alreddy have
> >>>>users reeding TOO HOWTO's PLUS the ones they alreddy half toreed to get the rest
>of CommyLie-nux working.
> >>>
> >>>Can't you set up your Windoze-based newsreader so it doesn't spew these
> >>>mile-long lines?
> >>
> >>Cant you make your Generly Not Usefall (GNU) CommyLie-nux crap to handall long
>lines propperly?
> >
> >1) My newsreader is of my own design and handles long lines just fine,
> > thank you very much...
>
> Proov my point again why do'nt you? In UNIX you half to rite your own programms, and
>your another exampel.
>
> >
> >2) but others read news in university labs and such, using VT100 terminals
> > with no GUI capability.
>
> Today's universitty's have Windows. If all your universitty has are UNIX, then your
>universitty is living in a cave.
Caves like University of California, Berkely...MIT, Purdue, Carnegie
Mellon.
Yeah...some caves.
>
> >
> >3) Then there are those who have to use large fonts just to read news at
> > all. Some of them are even Windoze users.
> >
> >4) You could horizontally scroll but that's a PITA.
>
> ...only if you use SLRN. In Outlook its easie you just use scroalbar.
>
you are addled.
> >
> >5) Hence long-standing rules of netiquette call for lines to wrap in the
> > low 70's.
> >
> >You piss and moan that Linux makes *you* work harder, yet you're perfectly
> >willing to make *others* work harder to read your posts. Timmy-boy,
> >you're not just a Wintroll. You're also a hypocrite.
>
> That only half to work harder becase they use UNIX and UNIX make's them work
> harder. Thats' my
> hoal point. UNIX blows. Windo's is miles ahed of UNIX and you peopal are still
> acting like UNIX was
> stait-of-the-art.
lets see...
for f in `cat [file with a list of files to process]`
do
echo "processing file $f"
process_with_awk_script_to_edit and_rearrange_columns $f
done
Or, alternatively, using LoseDOS drool-and-click to process
50 files by hand.
Only a moron can fail to see that the LoseDOS interface
is FAR more work
>
> >>>...which is why nearly every Linux newsreader has a decent killfile,
> >>>unlike Lookout; why nearly every Linux newsreader honors user-
> >>>supplied margins, unlike Lookout; why no self-respecting Linux mail
> >>>client goes around spreading viruses, unlike Lookout....
> >>>
> >>>Oh, but Orifice does have that cute little paper clip. That paper clip
> >>>must fascinate you, doesn't it, Timmy-boy?
> >
> >I see you couldn't address this point.
> >
>
> I dont see any point to adress.
Blindness is not victory
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "greenplasticman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: RE: apache_server config
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 10:34:31 -0400
Joachim Feise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribi� en el mensaje de noticias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Hello Everyone
> >
> > i recently installed redhat Linux 6.2 with squid and Apache server ver
> > 1.3.12.
> > From windows Pc i am unable to connect to Apache web server ,it is not
> > even showing "It worked". I am wetting error message "403 forbidden you
> > dont have permission to access on this server.
>
> This usually means that the permissions on the htdocs directory are wrong.
> Do a chmod o+x on the directory.
>
Or verify the Directory Index, may be don't have asociated your initial page
or DirectoryRoot is not set correctly.
--
Rodrigo Henriquez M.
Fono : +56-2-6986671
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ : 67102514
_____________________________________________
RADIOHEAD : did u hear a sound like this?
------------------------------
From: Nathaniel Jay Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Growing dependence on Java
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 09:30:27 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2000 17:01:00 -0500, Nathaniel Jay Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> ...the latest Star Office is 260M. A few more megs for an embedded
> >> Java enviroment is not going to make much difference.
> >>
> >
> >While I agree completely, this seems to be the one little sticking point
> >with Star Office where they actually seem to *care* about adding MB.
> >Maybe there is some licensing issue I'm not aware of or something. But
> >they really seem to dislike the idea of bundling in a Java
> >implementation. Of course, it could just be because they want people to
> >have their own choice of what Java run-time they want to use (if only
> >more Java apps did this).
>
> They could still bundle in Sun's own implementation and still
> offer the end user a choice to use the already installed version.
>
True enough. I guess only Sun knows the reason that they don't do
this. Before it belonged to Sun it might have been more obvious, but
the latest version should have done exactly what you describe.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nathaniel Jay Lee
------------------------------
From: Nathaniel Jay Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: To Pete Goodwin: How Linux saved my lunch today!
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 09:33:57 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have the same impulses on the rare occassions that I sit in front of an
> already booted Windows machine (but of course, they get frustrated). *While*
> booting a Windows machine, I find myself anxiously watching it, to see whether
> it will succeed or fail.
Yeah, I've had that feeling before too. Tell me something. Have you
ever been using Windows and caught yourself hitting CNTRL-ALT-F1 to get
to a console. I don't use Windows often anymore, but when I do I spend
about half of my time hitting keys for consoles and then being
disappointed when it doesn't drop the GUI. Another thing some of us
can't live without.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nathaniel Jay Lee
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: What happens when all the bit twiddlers are gone?
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 10:42:26 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> But what really will happen when us bit-twiddlers are gone? You don't
> write device drivers with a mouse. And you don't write compilers in
> Visual Basic.
>
> Sadly, there's a horrifying impetus in my home state that favors dumping
> the traditional educational operating systems in favor of a closed
> Microsoft-only campus. If this happens, who will write the next
> generation process scheduling algorithms? Who will create the next leap
> in system kernel architecture? Increasingly, it looks like the entire
> United States is intentionally pushing this development offshore to
> whichever countries choose not to do what my country is doing. And
> that's truly sad, because we're not only crippling U.S. students with
> this perverted philosophy, we're dooming future generations of U.S.
> knowledge workers to be subservient to innovation that will continue
> elsewhere on the planet whether we like it or not.
The Political Left is striving to cause us to collapse from within.
Sadly, they ar winning.
>
> Like the advert for my state lottery says, "you can't win if you don't
> play".
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: C# is a copy of java
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 10:43:35 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I agree, I see C++ as with just C with a few nice addons. But knowing the
> difference is handy when you have program in an environment that support C
> but not C++ or if you have to port to one of them.
When I was in college, C++ was merely a pre-processor before running
the C compiler.
>
> mlw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > Nitpicking time. That sample is not C it is C++. ;-)
> > >
> >
> > While there is religious debate on each side, I don't really care to
> > make a distinction. People will flame about this, but seriously, who
> > cares. C++ is just C with some more features like classes and templates,
> > and that's how I use it. I am more productive than the C purists that
> > have to re-invent the object/class wheel for each project (think GTK),
> > and my code is more efficient than the C++ purists that objectify
> > everything regardless if a modular approach makes more sense.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: C# is a copy of java
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 10:44:29 -0400
mlw wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I agree, I see C++ as with just C with a few nice addons. But knowing the
> > difference is handy when you have program in an environment that support C
> > but not C++ or if you have to port to one of them.
>
> Obviously, one should end the source module with .cpp or .cc. Are there
> any environments in which if C is available, C++ is not?
Apple ][ ?
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux lags behind Windows
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 10:47:19 -0400
Pete Goodwin wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Aaron Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Does the term "race condition" mean anything to you?
>
> Yes.
>
> Your point? How does this relate to "Linux lags behind Windows" or
> anything else for that matter?
>
> Are your posts always one liners with about 99% of the original posted
> with it?
Evidently, Goodwin has NO understanding of "race conditions" and
therefore, has no understanding why application programmers should
understand the process scheduler if they want to achieve excellance
in their field.
In fact, that seems to be Pete's entire problem:
He is *SATISFIED* with mediocrity.
>
> --
> ---
> Pete
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux lags behind Windows
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 10:49:08 -0400
Pete Goodwin wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Sanders) wrote in
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Wow! Pot, kettle, black.
>
> I think not.
>
> > Aaron was responding to a point of _yours_. That's something I only
> >see you do very rarely. Don't 'cha think "Linux lags behind Windows" is
> >a one-liner of yours?
>
> He rarely responds, and usually with off the topic short replies.
Understanding Race conditions is one of SEVERAL reasons why any
application
programmer (at least those who want to achieve excellance) should learn
about the process scheduler for the platform on which they program.
>
> > Here's is a quote from one of your recent posts:
> > "This from the guy who believes an application programmer needs to
> >understand how the OS scheduler works in order to write an application?"
> > Why don't you explain what _that_ has to do with "Linux lags behind
> >Windows"?
> > Try not to dodge this time, and see if you can give an intellignet
> >response to Aaron.
>
> I'm waiting for his response. I'm still waiting. I'm still waiting for his
> response to the question "Why do I, an application developer, need to
> understand how the scheduler works?". He never did respond.
I already told you: Race Conditions.
>
> Pete
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux lags behind Windows
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 10:50:34 -0400
Pete Goodwin wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron Kulkis) wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >write like a fucking moron, and I'll call you a fucking moron.
> >
> >If you wish to be referred to by more..exemplary terms,
> >then improve your comprehension of the world.
> >
> >Until then, don't complain about the terms that are used to
> >describe your behavior, when, in fact, those terms are accurate.
>
> By your incredibly idiotic and pathetic standards.
>
> I don't need to improve my comprehension of the world, you need to clean
> out that gutter mouth of yours.
I tried communicating with you on a higher level.
you failed to respond in an intelligent manner.
Therefore, I switched to a dialect more appropriate for your
lack of displayed intelligence.
>
> Pete
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux lags behind Windows
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 10:51:46 -0400
Pete Goodwin wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Aaron Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You said:
>
> > Face it Pete....
> >
> > YOU'RE A FUCKING MORON!
>
> and I said earlier:
>
> > > The final resort of the feeble mind. If it doesn't agree with you,
> SHOUT
> > > YOUR FOUL MOUTH OF AT IT IN THE HOPE IT'LL GO AWAY.
>
> Q.E.D.
OK.....we need to get this straightened out..
If, as you say, you are *not* a FUCKING MORON...then, please tell us,
EXACTLY ***WHAT*** KIND OF MORON ARE YOU?
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.advocacy) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
