Linux-Advocacy Digest #554, Volume #28 Tue, 22 Aug 00 08:13:06 EDT
Contents:
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2451779 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2451778 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It? (Eric Bennett)
Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It? (Eric Bennett)
Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It? (Eric Bennett)
Re: Sherman Act vaguery [was: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It?] (Eric Bennett)
Re: Sherman Act vaguery [was: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It?] (Eric Bennett)
Re: refrigerator using Linux? (Karri Kalpio)
Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It? (Illya Vaes)
Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It? (ZnU)
Re: BASIC == Beginners language (Was: Just curious.... (Donal K. Fellows)
Re: Fragmentation of Linux Community? Yeah, right! (John Sanders)
Re: refrigerator using Linux? (Andres Soolo)
Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Tholen digest, volume 2451779.t6r3^-.0000000000001 ("Joe Malloy")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crossposted-To:
comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Malloy digest, volume 2451779
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 08:35:23 GMT
Here's today's Malloy digest. Notice how he's ignored the evidence
for the fact that he likes to "hear" himself, as well as the
evidence for his reading comprehension problem. Nor did he explain
why he's ignored Slava's question.
171> Here's today's Tholen digest. Notice how he's ignored the evidence for the
171> fact that he likes to "hear" himself, as well as the evidence for his
171> reading comprehension problem. He's still trying the old parrot routine, of
171> course, but what can you expect? To the digest proper, wherein are located
171> all of Tholen's snappy comebacks:
171>
171> [No snappy comebacks from Tholen!]
171>
171> Bye!
==========
Malloy likes to hear himself. The evidence:
"I take it Tholen has attempted to digest me, but since no message
to that effect appears on my newserver today, I present an oldie:"
--Joe Malloy
Maybe it's because he has trouble seeing. The evidence:
"Where does he say anything about clergy, Tholen?"
--Joe Malloy
"It follows from your pontificating actions and the discussion
of the clergy..."
--Eric Bennett
------------------------------
Crossposted-To:
comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Malloy digest, volume 2451778
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 08:38:20 GMT
Slava Pestov writes:
> Joe Malloy wrote:
>> Here's today's Tholen digest. Notice how he's ignored the evidence for
>> the fact that he likes to "hear" himself, as well as the evidence for
>> his reading comprehension problem. Ah, well, what can you expect from a
>> Tholen, eh? The digest improper --
>>
>> {No, he hasn't said anything of value here yet!] (By the way, Tholen,
>> here's some extras for you: ))(({{}}[[]---- - insert them where the sun
>> don't....)
>>
>> Thanks for reading!
> Why do you post exactly the same thing in each one of your "digests",
> and then hypocritically accuse Tholen of not saying "anything of value"?
You weren't seriously expecting a response from Malloy, were you? He
can't argue that he doesn't know about your question, given that I
referred to it in a posting to which he responded.
By the way, Malloy's postings would be hypocritical only if he had
stated that he always posts items containing some value. The word
you should have used is "ironically".
------------------------------
From: Eric Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It?
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 04:42:08 -0400
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "JS/PL"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "T. Max Devlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Said Joe Ragosta in comp.os.linux.advocacy;
> > >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [...]
> > >Nope. I've read the Sherman Act. There's nothing in there that
> > >supports
> > >your position.
> >
> > You mean 'it is illegal to monopolize' doesn't support the position
> > that
> > having a monopoly is illegal?
> >
> > >Feel free to provide the exact quotation where it makes having a
> > >monopoly illegal.
> >
> > "Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or
> > combine
> > or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of
> > the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign
> > nations,
> > shall be deemed guilty of a felony"
>
> Here's the whole paragraph:
> **********
>
> Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine
> or
> conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the
> trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations,
> shall
> be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be
> punished
> by fine not exceeding $10,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other
> person,
> $350,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding three years, or by both said
> punishments, in the discretion of the court.
>
> **********
>
> Not only has the trial been riddled with unlawfull acts against
> Microsoft,
> even the penalty hasn't been lawfully applied. According to the law, fine
> them 10 million and be done with it :-)
That has been interpreted as $10 million for every day a company fails
to come into compliance with the law. Of course, Microsoft makes more
than $10 million in profits every day, so they could just pay the fines
and keep violating the law until Congress decided to increase the fine.
--
Eric Bennett ( http://www.pobox.com/~ericb/ )
Cornell University / Chemistry & Chemical Biology
------------------------------
From: Eric Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It?
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 04:43:33 -0400
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Courageous
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> JS/PL wrote:
>
> > Not only has the trial been riddled with unlawfull acts against
> > Microsoft,
> > even the penalty hasn't been lawfully applied. According to the law,
> > fine
> > them 10 million and be done with it :-)
>
> It would be within the spirit of the law to make those year-2000
> adjusted dollars. :)
They are not that far away from year-2000 dollars. The fines have been
increased over the years.
--
Eric Bennett ( http://www.pobox.com/~ericb/ )
Cornell University / Chemistry & Chemical Biology
------------------------------
From: Eric Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It?
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 04:51:11 -0400
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "JS/PL"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "T. Max Devlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Said JS/PL in comp.os.linux.advocacy;
> > >"T. Max Devlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > [...]
> > >My power company has a minuscule amount of market share, yet...they
> > >are a
> > >monopoly,
They have 100% market share in the relevant market. Markets can be
geographically constrained. See Jefferson Parish Hospital v. Hyde.
> > Maybe from your perspective, and in the casual vernacular, but they are
> > not a monopoly "in the legal sense", as it were. They are a public
> > utility.
> No they are a private company holding a monopoly over their market. They
> are a monopoly in the legal sense because if I decided to sell power in
> their government granted market territory, I would be legaly prosecuted,
> and
> sued out of business.
Can people sell batteries in that government-granted market territory?
Can people sell a gas-powered generator? If so, they people are selling
power... even the same type of power (electrical).
Maybe you think that's an incredibly obtuse argument, but it isn't any
worse than the argument I've seen that Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly
because it's such a small part of the overall software industry.
Also, you can compete for direct delivery of AC electrical power insofar
as you convince the local government that you can provide power more
efficiently and get them to grant the monopoly to you instead of the
other guy.
--
Eric Bennett ( http://www.pobox.com/~ericb/ )
Cornell University / Chemistry & Chemical Biology
------------------------------
From: Eric Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Sherman Act vaguery [was: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It?]
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 04:55:00 -0400
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Courageous
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Have you ever seen a more vague set of laws?
>
> "Shall not be infringed" is not vague. It's absolute. Only
> in modernity has it become vague. Possibly by necessity,
> possibly by the shifting sands of time, possibly by who
> knows what. But they really meant it then.
>
> They were working really very hard to be crystal, crystal
> clear.
"Unreasonable searches and seizures". What is "unreasonable"? That's
just as vague as determining what constitutes an illegal restraint of
trade under the antitrust statues.
"Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor
cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." What is "excessive"? Is the
death penalty "cruel" punishment?
The only thing that's crystal clear is that it isn't crystal clear.
--
Eric Bennett ( http://www.pobox.com/~ericb/ )
Cornell University / Chemistry & Chemical Biology
------------------------------
From: Eric Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Sherman Act vaguery [was: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It?]
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 04:57:40 -0400
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Courageous
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Take Prohibition, for example. At least then they _knew_ they
> had to have an Amendment to do that. Now, however, it appears
> they don't. They really don't need an Amendment for much of
> anything these days.
Then why do the conservatives think they need an amendment for flag
burning and another one for abortion?
> Disturbing.
What's disturbing is how close the flag burning amendment is to actually
becoming law. Just a couple more votes in the Senate and flag burning
will become illegal (49 of the 50 states have specifically asked
Congress to pass the amendment, so it's a shoo-in for ratification by
the states).
--
Eric Bennett ( http://www.pobox.com/~ericb/ )
Cornell University / Chemistry & Chemical Biology
------------------------------
From: Karri Kalpio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: refrigerator using Linux?
Date: 22 Aug 2000 12:12:11 +0300
"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Craig Kelley wrote:
> >
> > "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > mind setting your line length to 70 columns or thereabouts, so that
> > > people can read your posts...
> > http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/faq/part1/
> > Read the part about signatures before you complain about other's
> > posts...
...
> my .sig doesn't interfere with readability.
It does interfere with the netiquette, however.
--karri
--
/"\ : Karri Kalpio
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X Against HTML Mail : [+358] (40) 5926895 (mobile)
/ \ : [+358] (9) 75111771 (work)
------------------------------
From: Illya Vaes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It?
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 11:24:11 +0200
Joe Ragosta wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>No, they should be regulated *by* ethics, and minimized by competition.
>>Anything else truly is a foolish idea.
>Wrong. If you believed in a free market (as you pretend to), you'd
>realize that companies are driven by obtaining the maximum profit
>possible without breaking the law.
Maximum over which timeframe? One fiscal year? Two years? Ten? Thirty? Fifty?
Usually "people" don't like greedy "people", so if you ask too much, next time
they'll go to someone less greedy and in the long-term the profit is lower.
*IF* they have a choice that is, which they don't have much of in the context
of this discussion (MS)...
--
Illya Vaes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Do...or do not, there is no 'try'" - Yoda
Holland Railconsult BV, Integral Management of Railprocess Systems
Postbus 2855, 3500 GW Utrecht
Tel +31.30.2653273, Fax 2653385 Not speaking for anyone but myself
------------------------------
From: ZnU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It?
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 09:31:02 GMT
In article <Oako5.38395$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Shocktrooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Joseph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, Christopher Smith wrote:
> > >"Joseph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Christopher Smith wrote:
> >
> >
> > >> You know better - MS is a monopoly that's been found to abuse
> > >> it's power.
> > >
> > >Just because I know it, doesn't mean I have to agree with it.
> >
> > "Agreeing" and "ignoring" are different things unless you're a
> > meglomaniac.
> >
> > ..
> >
> > >> What Chris wants he makes up.. This is make-believe - why not
> > >> pretend
> > >your Bill
> > >> Gates or Sha-zam?
> > >
> > >Of course I make up my own opinions.
> >
> > Facts are not opinions. You make up your own facts while ignoring
> > those you do not like. The distinction is lost on you.
> >
> > The Judge's Finding of Fact isn't an opinion. It's the factual
> > finding of a court which represents the interests of The People.
>
> Would this be the same "The People" whose representatives found OJ
> not guilty of murder?
Do you oppose representative government?
--
This universe shipped by weight, not volume. Some expansion may have
occurred during shipment.
ZnU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <http://znu.dhs.org>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donal K. Fellows)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: BASIC == Beginners language (Was: Just curious....
Date: 22 Aug 2000 09:40:58 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Donal K. Fellows" wrote:
>> I don't like VB, but its better than doing everything in C++!
>
> If you had Korn Shell available, you would hate VB.
I have ksh available. I despise it too.
Donal (Ah, my favourite .sig!)
--
"If something like this happened in the real world, not only would I be under
NDA, but I would also be afraid of having my own personal butt involved in
the legal equivalent of the massacre of Little Big Horn, with the lawyers
starring as the Indians." -- Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: John Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Fragmentation of Linux Community? Yeah, right!
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 05:12:33 -0500
Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
> If the Linux consensus is that DnD will not be supported under multiple
> environments, then Linux has lost the war. It will never, as a desktop OS,
> surpass even the Macintosh, which does have a common API for DnD across all
> it's apps.
I hope you're right.
--
John W. Sanders
===============
"there" in or at a place.
"their" of or relating to them.
"they're" contraction of 'they are'.
------------------------------
From: Andres Soolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: refrigerator using Linux?
Date: 22 Aug 2000 11:33:14 GMT
Cihl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you think anyone would actually try to put a PC in a refrigerator?
> I don't think so.
You're late :-)
It has been done already as a public demonstration last Summer during
an Estonian project called Tiigrituur. It was called Ku"lmGAP (the u
is umlauted) as a pun for `ku"lmkapp' which means `refrigerator'. Sorry,
I can't find any English documentation at the moment. It was an ordinary
486-based PC except it had a touch-sensitive screen as the main terminal
device, mounted inside the door.
And, interestingly enough, they used Linux as the OS.
--
Andres Soolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The road to Hades is easy to travel.
-- Bion
------------------------------
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It?
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 20:18:04 -0400
Joe Ragosta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>In article <399f4ae2$2$yrgbherq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> T. Max Devlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> >Said [EMAIL PROTECTED] in comp.os.linux.advocacy;
>> >>Joe Ragosta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> >>
>> >><snip>
>> >>
>> >>>If you believed in free markets, you wouldn't be posting drivel along
>> >>>the
>> >>>lines that companies shouldn't be allowed to "profiteer" (to use your
>> >>>meaningless word).
>> >>
>> >>The US Congress has used the word too. But I suppose you think the
>> >>people's
>> >>representatives are meaningless too. Eh?
>>
>> >Where was that. I doubt it was in the current context, but I'd be
>> >interested
>> >in hearing about it anyway.
>>
>> No it isn't in the current context, never the less the issue comes up
>> from
>> time to time, and has since 1776. Usually the talking heads on the
>> network
>> news don't mention the issue, or they don't use the word profiteering --
>> but
>> its there in the story. In the recent times (last 10 years) it comes up
>> most
>> often on health care, and the pharmaceutical industry, but we saw it on
>> the
>> price of gasoline earlier this year too.
>>
>Let's see if I have this straight.
>You claimed that Congress used the phrase profiteering. When asked to
>provide evidence, you say that you don't have any evidence, but you
>think that they might have said something like that 200 years ago. Then
>you say they _don't_ use the word, after all, but that's what they
>really meant. AND, the ones who didn't use the word, but meant it
>weren't the Congress, anyway.
>Does that about sum it up?
Listen up asshole, read what I said again -- carefully this time and then ask your
question.
--
===========================================================
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===========================================================
------------------------------
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It?
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 20:16:21 -0400
Joe Ragosta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>In article <399f434b$1$yrgbherq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Joe Ragosta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> >In article <399f0303$2$yrgbherq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> >> Joe Ragosta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> >>
>> >> <snip>
>> >>
>> >> >If you believed in free markets, you wouldn't be posting drivel along
>> >> >
>> >> >the
>> >> >lines that companies shouldn't be allowed to "profiteer" (to use
>> >> >your
>> >> >meaningless word).
>> >>
>> >> The US Congress has used the word too. But I suppose you think the
>> >> people's
>> >> representatives are meaningless too. Eh?
>>
>> >Where has the U.S. Congress stated that companies shouldn't be allowed
>> >to
>> >protect their own intellectual property and should face civil
>> >injunctions
>> >for charging too much (both of these are positions you've taken).
>>
>> Your coming right out of LaLa land even asking the first question,
>IOW, you don't know if it's true, either.
>> considering
>> the various laws protecting intellectual property. On the second there is
>Of course. In case you hadn't noticed, I'm the one defending
>intellectual property laws.
>T. Max Devlin is arguing that he should be able to pick and choose which
>intellectual property laws he wants.
>> wide
>> agreement that companies who artificially manipulate a market in order to
>> charge more, e.g., gouge the buyer, should face sanctions for essential
>That's true.
>But I don't believe charging what the market will bear is an example of
>"artificially manipulating a market". T. Mac apparently does.
>> products. Your position seems to be that anyone should be always be
>> allowed
>> to do what ever they want. You are wrong and always will be.
>>
>You're entitled to that position.
Reading comprehension problems? I'm refering to you and what you are saying!
E.g., you're the one with the weird positions.
>Just stop pretending that you're taking a free market position, OK?
Are you on something or is the real you? There is no free market with M$ in
control.
--
===========================================================
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===========================================================
------------------------------
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It?
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 20:11:16 -0400
JS/PL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>"T. Max Devlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> Said JS/PL in comp.os.linux.advocacy;
>> >"T. Max Devlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> >> Said JS/PL in comp.os.linux.advocacy;
>> [...]
>> >> Deal with it. Don't come back until you have a point.
>> >
>> >You'll have to ...how you say.... "kill_me" to keep me out of
>> >comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy. Maybe I should make a newsgroup about
>your
>> >insane and murderous ramblings.
>> >What should I call it? alt.timothy.devlin.the.wannabe.killer ?
>> >
>> >Let me know, it can be created in minutes (really).
>>
>> You know, if you posted with a real name, the fact that you seem to have
>> uncovered my real first name, which I haven't used, generally, in years,
>> along with the fact that you have threatened some sort of social
>> ridicule, might be enough to concern or even offend some people. But
>> you don't post with a real name; you might as well be a nine year old
>> child, for all the seriousness that anyone's going to give you.
>>
>> You apparently have put some effort into finding out who I am, even
>> though I post with my real identity, while I haven't even briefly
>> contemplated bothering to try to find out who "JS/PL" is. Though I did
>> think it might be fun to see what you did when I said I want to kill
>> whatever that is after your so pathetically obvious attempt to get Aaron
>> to threaten the life of Bill Gates. I must say that the results are far
>> beyond what I could have hoped for. But I think its pretty obvious who
>> the psychopath here is, 'J'. Best you chill out now, before you get
>> yourself into trouble.
>No, when someone puts out a death threat against me, I do the opposite of
>"chill out" I find them and turn them in to the authorities. Now that I have
>fired off a complaint to the Bureau of Criminal Investigation in Scranton, PA
>as of today, they now know a whole lot about you. More than you could fathom.
>If they choose NOT to do anything about it whatever, I believe it is very
>important to begin a paper trail immediately on you due to the fact that you
>have committed a crime by issuing a death threat against me. It is
>psychopaths like you which cause me to mask my identity online, although it
>would take minimal investigation on your part to identify and make good on
>your wish to kill me.
>P.S. You really SHOULD watch those outgoing packets. :-)
You are complete idiot.
===========================================================
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===========================================================
------------------------------
From: "Joe Malloy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Tholen digest, volume 2451779.t6r3^-.0000000000001
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 11:55:26 GMT
Here's today's Tholen digest. Notice how he's ignored the evidence for the
fact that he likes to "hear" himself, as well as the evidence for his
reading comprehension problem. Nor did he explain why he's reiterated
Slava's question -- guess he's running out of his own limited supply. To
the digest!
[Nope, Tholen has yet to say anything new.]
Thanks for reading!
--
"USB, idiot, stands for Universal Serial Bus. There is no power on the
output socket of any USB port I have ever seen" - Bob Germer
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.advocacy) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
