Linux-Advocacy Digest #204, Volume #29 Tue, 19 Sep 00 08:13:06 EDT
Contents:
Re: [OT] Global warming. (was Public v. Private Schools) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: [OT] Global warming. (was Public v. Private Schools) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: [OT] Global warming. (was Public v. Private Schools) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: [OT] Global warming. (was Public v. Private Schools) (Jason Bowen)
Re: [OT] Global warming. (was Public v. Private Schools) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: [OT] Global warming. (was Public v. Private Schools) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Never tell me again that Windows is easy to install!!! It's a lie! ("Stuart
Fox")
Re: Id Software developer prefers OS X to Linux, NT (Stuart Krivis)
Re: [OT] Global warming. (was Public v. Private Schools) (Jason Bowen)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: [OT] Global warming. (was Public v. Private Schools)
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 07:15:51 -0400
Bob Germer wrote:
>
> On 09/18/2000 at 10:09 PM,
> "Joseph T. Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > The catastrophes of earlier geological ages did not destroy the earth,
> > nor will our activities, but they *did* change the climate in ways that
> > would have been horribly destructive to human civilization had it
> > existed at the time. The fear is that our far smaller, but still
> > potentially significant, activities might similarly cause destruction to
> > human (and other) habitats in the relatively near future.
>
> > I'm not convinced that it will. I'm convinced that it might, though,
> > and that the chance that it might is sufficient reason for us to
> > continue to study and to evaluate our activities to make sure that we
> > aren't creating any potentially avoidable problems.
>
> I'm not convinced that when I take off in an airplane that it won't fall
> apart and kill me. However, that doesn't stop me from flying the plane. If
> we all followed you advice, we would still be living in caves debating
> whether fire was good or bad.
>
> > : It's rather arrogant and self-important
> > : to think that humans are so powerful that we could permanently change
> > : or destroy the ecosystem and have it stay permanently dead.
>
> > I don't think anyone is alleging that we could permanently destroy the
> > Earth. Only that our activities, if continued unchecked, could alter
> > climate substantially enough, and for long enough, to have a detrimental
> > impact on human and other habitats.
>
> Ah a Luddite of the first order. Why don't you go back, live in a cave,
> hunt for your food, and worry about what effect fire will have on your
> environment.
And when he cuts his finger and falls in the animal shit, he should
also forsake penicillin and other anti-biotics.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
their behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: [OT] Global warming. (was Public v. Private Schools)
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 07:22:21 -0400
"Joseph T. Adams" wrote:
>
> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Chad Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote in part:
>
> : The Earth is a system of balances. If one thing gets out of whack,
> : 10 other things compensate to restore the balance.
>
> This is true of market economies also.
>
> The problem is that it can take a really long time (from our
> perspective at least) for the damage to be corrected.
>
> : This has been happening over billions of years. Many more catastrophic
> : things have happened to the ecosystem that Humans could ever cook up
> : and the ecosystem restored itself in a geological second. The amount
> : of data we, as humans, have collected scientifically over the past
> : 1-200 years is nothing. It's not even a nano-second in geological
> : terms. To conclude or attempt to draw anything from these statistics
> : is meaningless and absurd to say the least.
>
> We've collected substantial evidence of the earth's geological
> history.
>
> The catastrophes of earlier geological ages did not destroy the earth,
> nor will our activities, but they *did* change the climate in ways
> that would have been horribly destructive to human civilization had it
> existed at the time. The fear is that our far smaller, but still
> potentially significant, activities might similarly cause destruction
> to human (and other) habitats in the relatively near future.
>
> I'm not convinced that it will. I'm convinced that it might, though,
> and that the chance that it might is sufficient reason for us to
> continue to study and to evaluate our activities to make sure that we
> aren't creating any potentially avoidable problems.
>
> : Dinosaur populations excreted more methane and CO/2 than humans
> : could ever hope to generate.
>
> Yep. But most of the sites of today's cities were under water then.
> Later, most of today's lakes and straits and mountains were under
> thousands of feet of ice. Neither of those outcomes would be
> particularly desirable today.
>
> : It's rather arrogant and self-important
> : to think that humans are so powerful that we could permanently change
> : or destroy the ecosystem and have it stay permanently dead.
>
> I don't think anyone is alleging that we could permanently destroy the
> Earth. Only that our activities, if continued unchecked, could alter
> climate substantially enough, and for long enough, to have a
> detrimental impact on human and other habitats.
>
> : We will
> : kill ourselves with war or accidentally releasing a deadly virus
> : into the world before we'll ever hope to destroy this planet.
>
> Very possible. We've come damn close, more than once. Closer than
> most people are willing to believe.
>
> : Granted, we shouldn't try, I agree we need to control ourselves
>
> That's all I'm saying. It's all that responsible environmentalists
> are saying too. (There are a lot of very *irresponsible* folks
> pretending to be environmentalists that are saying a lot more.
> Mostly, those are folks with political agendas, usually of a leftist
> variety, who *use* well-meaning but naive environmental activists to
> promote that agenda.)
>
> , but
> : this world has been through huge floods, all sorts of geological
> : disasters (giant earthquakes, massive volcanoes spewing millions of
> : tons of CO/2, methane, and all other sorts of noxious gasses into
> : the atmosphere) and look where we are today, paradise.
>
> We have an environment that is in many respects better than it ever
> has been (more free from infectious disease, for example).
>
> The challenge is keeping it that way.
>
> And in spite of the progress we've made, there still are serious
> problems such as air pollution in large cities, both air and water
> pollution behind the former Iron Curtain, rapid deforestation in
> certain areas (mostly South America and Latin America), and, to be
> blunt, unsustainable development in certain parts of the world where
> there simply is not enough guaranteed fresh water to sustain life.
> (The wealthy oil states of the Middle East, and the urban areas of the
> southwestern U.S., are prime examples of this).
Not enough fresh water to sustain life..in the MidEast?
Are you fucking insane?
I spent a year in Saudi Arabia....100% desert. We had more fresh water
than we knew what to do with...and there are HUGE farms in that desert,
growing absolutely fantastic crops...with FRESH WATER.
Tell me, how does one grow crops that require fresh-water if there
is a shortage of same?
Oh, and have you ever flown over Arizona or New Mexico? You will
notice HUGE GREEN CIRCLES, where, once again, there are large
(FRESH-WATER BASED) FARMING ACTIVITIES.
Clue for the fucking clueless idiot:
Ever hear of DESALINIZATION!?!?!?!
>
> Preventable diseases still kill tens of millions in the poorest
> countries. Wars and famines caused mostly by statist political
> ideologies claim many more.
Only becuase those countries are run by dictators who have a
sincere interest in keeping their countrymen down, a la the
children's game "King of the Mountain"
>
> We're doing better than we did in the past in many ways, but there is
> still much work left to be done.
In case you haven't noticed, the most technologically advanced
societies are producing the LEAST amount of pollution, environmental
waste, etc.
>
> As a libertarian I hope it can be done the way it should be, namely,
> by voluntary cooperation and consent.
You are a disgrace to libertarians everywhere.
>
> But it does need to be done.
>
> I don't know if global warming is something we can control, or should
> attempt to. But I certainly would like to know. And I certainly
> suggest caution in the meantime.
>
> : We're do for
> : another ice age here in about 25-50,000 years or so, we're probably
> : just seeing the cycle repeat itself and seeing the ecosystem building
> : up and building up for the next ice age when it'll all start over
> : again and the same thing will happen 100,000 years after that like
> : it's done for the past several million years.
>
> Probably.
>
> But in the meantime I'd like those who will come after me to be able
> to enjoy the same, or better, environmental AND economic conditions
> that we have today.
>
> To ensure this, we must avoid both extremes. We must not destroy
> people's livelihoods in a vain attempt to meet arbitrary or
> unrealistic goals that might not be necessary or even worthwhile. At
> the same time, we must not ignore the mounting evidence that warming
> *is* occurring, that human activities *may* be contributing to it, and
> that the costs for dealing with it *will* be staggering.
>
> : Humanity is not even a blink of an eye in the Earth's history and
> : it's not about to be destroyed by us.
>
> Unlike some of my more left-leaning peers, I'm not concerned about the
> destruction of Earth, so much as I am about the destruction of human
> (and other) life on it.
>
> Joe
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
their behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: [OT] Global warming. (was Public v. Private Schools)
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 07:23:52 -0400
Alan Baker wrote:
>
> In article <39c6f112$6$obot$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Bob Germer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On 09/18/2000 at 03:00 AM,
> > Jason Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> >> > According to the Encylopedia Brittanica that fast current glaciers
> >> > advance at as much as 25 metres a day. That's 9.125 kilometres a year.
> >> > To advance over half of Canada (say conservatively, 1800 kilometres)
> >> > glaciers would have to advance at roughly 200 times that fast or 5
> >> > kilometres a day. I just find that a little hard to believe.
> >
> >> I should say formation and not advancement, sounds wrong.
> >
> >Too late, liar. You stated several times that Canada was half covered with
> >an ice sheet in the past decade. Now you try to weasel out. I for one will
> >not let you off the hook.
>
> Umm, Bob. Dial it down, would you?
What....are you saying that Bob should just sit idly by as Jason
spews his idiotic lies and propaganda?
For evil to prevail, it is required that good men do nothing.
Why are you advocating that good men do nothing?
Hmmmmmmm?
>
> --
> Alan Baker
> Vancouver, British Columbia
> "If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall to that
> wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you sit in the
> bottom of that cupboard."
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
their behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: Jason Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: [OT] Global warming. (was Public v. Private Schools)
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 05:23:26 -0600
"Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
>
> Bob Germer wrote:
> >
> > On 09/18/2000 at 08:20 AM,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Bowen) said:
> >
> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > > Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >Jason Bowen wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> In article <39c5b800$10$obot$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > > >> Bob Germer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> >On 09/18/2000 at 05:41 AM,
> > > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Bowen) said:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> And again your ideas are supported by those you support? What is your
> > > >> >> point Bob?
> > > >> >
> > > >> >My point is that you and your ilk are pointy headed, Chicken Little's
> > > >> >claiming the sky is falling.
> > > >>
> > > >> Except I didn't do that. I pointed to some facts and didn't make claims
> > > >> as fact. CFC's are man made and the CO2 level is verifiably higher than
> > > >> it has been in 600k years.
> >
> > And you infer that these two items, one fact, one conjecture, are directly
> > interrelated.
> >
> > Let's look at this using the scientific method.
> >
> > 1. CFC's are man made. This is demonstrable fact not in dispute.
> >
> > 2. CO2 levels are verifyably higher than they have been in 600,000 years.
> > This is conjecture. No one has proven by the scientific method that this
> > is true. It is an unproven and unprovable theory. Nothing more, just a
> > theory. Since we do not have reliable data from 600,000 years ago, we
> > don't know what the levels were then.
> >
> > 3. You have failed to provide any demonstrable, measurable, repeatable
> > proof that the two are in any way related to the exclusion of all other
> > possibilities.
> >
> > > >
> > > >BzzzzzzT! who the fuck cares?
> > > >
> > > >Plant-growth and polar ice core samples show that global warming
> > > >PRECEDES rises in C02.
> >
> > > BZZZZZ. Those polar ice cores you point to show that CO2 has never been
> > > this high and show that CFC's weren't around till this century.
> >
> > Again. You post as fact a theory that has more holes than 600,000 tons of
> > Swiss cheese.
> >
> > Are your parents paying for your education or are you stealing from other
> > folks. Whoever is footing the bill is obviously being cheated.
>
> Worst of all, he's the worst fucking OXYGEN THIEF at the U of C.
>
> I think he should do his part to prevent his much-fiered scenario of
> rising C02 levels and global warming....by putting a .45 pistol to
> his head and pulling the fucking trigger.
>
> One less source of C02.
Of course I've never said we were responsible for global warming. Man
I've got you in a tizzy. :-)
>
> --
> Aaron R. Kulkis
> Unix Systems Engineer
> ICQ # 3056642
>
> H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
> premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
> you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
> you are lazy, stupid people"
>
> I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
> challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
> between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
> Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
>
> A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
>
> B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
> method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
> direction that she doesn't like.
>
> C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
>
> D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
> ...despite (D) above.
>
> E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
> their behavior improves.
>
> F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
> adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
>
> G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,soc.singles,alt.fan.jackie-tokeman
Subject: Re: [OT] Global warming. (was Public v. Private Schools)
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 07:24:41 -0400
Jason Bowen wrote:
>
> Bob Germer wrote:
> >
> > On 09/18/2000 at 08:13 AM,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Bowen) said:
> >
> > > Do the math. The numbers are not actual numbers just a guide for those
> > > that had trouble with algebra 1 in middle school. You are like Bob, you
> > > just can't follow along.
> >
> > Post REAL numbers which can be VERIFIED independently. Otherwise your post
> > is just more crap from a real stupid fool.
> >
>
> You know Bob, I was proving a point about about total output, and how
> North America having a deficit doesn't mean the rest of the world has a
> deficit. You are obviously too incompetent to understand. I'll tell ya
> what, if you can find a carbon cycle diagram that says otherwise you are
> free to post a link to it but I know you won't be able to. Sucks to be
> you.
Goddamn, you're a stupid fuck!
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
their behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: [OT] Global warming. (was Public v. Private Schools)
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 07:28:11 -0400
Jason Bowen wrote:
>
> Bob Germer wrote:
> >
> > On 09/18/2000 at 08:14 AM,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Bowen) said:
> >
> > > >Bullshit. They spike after every volcanic eruption, and then drop
> > > >sharply according to exponential decay.
> >
> > > What spikes and drops?
> >
> > Go ask the professor of Geology 101.
> >
>
> It was Aaron's claim, let him take care of it.
All chemical reactions proceed at a rate determined by exponential
decay.
If you had the slightest bit of understanding, you would understand
this.
You see, this is how I know that you are an ignorant, uneducated little
freshman doing nothing other than repeating leftist eco-paranoid
propaganda.
Better to be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all
doubt.
--Abraham Lincoln.
In light of Mr. Lincoln's wisdom, I suggest that you
SIT DOWN AND SHUT THE FUCK UP!
Pseudo-intellectual moron.......
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
their behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Stuart Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Never tell me again that Windows is easy to install!!! It's a lie!
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 12:34:15 +0100
"Ingemar Lundin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:M7Hx5.216$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> "Stuart Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i meddelandet
> news:8q75ls$e0u$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> > Win2K took about 30 mins on a P-III 800, 256 MB, with 2 reboots. I
guess
> if
> > you can't count past 1, you might lose count...
>
> pure BS Stuart ...Windows 2000 takes at least an hour to install...(1 hour
> and 5 minutes to be exact, on my machine, p3 733, 256 MB, geforce gts,
> sblive platinum)
Pure BS, or just different from what you experienced? Windows 2000 takes a
varying length of time to install - minimum install time would seem to be
about 25 minutes.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stuart Krivis)
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Id Software developer prefers OS X to Linux, NT
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 07:16:12 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000 13:34:18 GMT, sfcybear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Wow, the numbers are up to two! Still, it is hardly headline news that
>*a* developer likes mac software. It proves NOTHING. I'm not saying that
>Mac OS is bad, I am saying that one, now 2, developers opinion are
>hardly proof of ANYTHING.
Given that developers always raved about how good the tools were with
NeXT, I'm not that surprised to find that Mac OS X also pleases
developers.
This guy I used to work for liked it enough that he bought black
hardware. We were talking about NeXT one day and he said, with a slight
smile, "They had a really cool development environment." From him that
was high praise indeed. :-)
--
Stuart Krivis
**remove the "mongo" for e-mail replies
------------------------------
From: Jason Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: [OT] Global warming. (was Public v. Private Schools)
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 05:36:17 -0600
"Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
>
> Jason Bowen wrote:
> >
> > Bob Germer wrote:
> > >
> > > On 09/18/2000 at 08:14 AM,
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Bowen) said:
> > >
> > > > >Bullshit. They spike after every volcanic eruption, and then drop
> > > > >sharply according to exponential decay.
> > >
> > > > What spikes and drops?
> > >
> > > Go ask the professor of Geology 101.
> > >
> >
> > It was Aaron's claim, let him take care of it.
>
> All chemical reactions proceed at a rate determined by exponential
> decay.
>
> If you had the slightest bit of understanding, you would understand
> this.
>
> You see, this is how I know that you are an ignorant, uneducated little
> freshman doing nothing other than repeating leftist eco-paranoid
> propaganda.
>
> Better to be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all
> doubt.
> --Abraham Lincoln.
>
> In light of Mr. Lincoln's wisdom, I suggest that you
>
> SIT DOWN AND SHUT THE FUCK UP!
>
> Pseudo-intellectual moron.......
>
That's a nice generalization but I asked for specifics which you can't
provide. What spikes and drops afer every eruption? Your paragraph
structure was ambigous.
> --
> Aaron R. Kulkis
> Unix Systems Engineer
> ICQ # 3056642
>
> H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
> premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
> you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
> you are lazy, stupid people"
>
> I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
> challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
> between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
> Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
>
> A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
>
> B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
> method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
> direction that she doesn't like.
>
> C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
>
> D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
> ...despite (D) above.
>
> E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
> their behavior improves.
>
> F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
> adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
>
> G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.advocacy) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
