Linux-Advocacy Digest #639, Volume #33 Mon, 16 Apr 01 09:13:03 EDT
Contents:
Re: Microsoft gets hard (Matthew Gardiner)
Re: Linux needs a standard, user proof distro (Matthew Gardiner)
Re: fail in configuring LILO ("Bobby D. Bryant")
Re: Col. Hack ("Pedro Coto")
Re: Pete Goodwin is in good company ("Pedro Coto")
Re: Microsoft: Closed source is more secure (pip)
Re: To Eric FunkenBush (Donn Miller)
Re: More Mafia$oft incompetance on display.. (Roy Culley)
Re: Microsoft should be feared and despised (Roy Culley)
Re: Win4Lin + Win 3.1 (Grahame Kelly)
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (Roberto Alsina)
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (Roberto Alsina)
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (Roberto Alsina)
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (Roberto Alsina)
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (Roberto Alsina)
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (Roberto Alsina)
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (Roberto Alsina)
Who can help me? ("ja")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Matthew Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.arch,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Microsoft gets hard
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 22:12:39 +1200
JS PL wrote:
>
> "unicat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> > Of course there's a name for companies that trusted Microsoft as a
> busniess
> > partner...extinct!
>
> Which one is extinct? There's about 32,000 Certified Business Partners
> Organizations. And about 6 million developers using Microsoft Development
> tools.
> http://www.microsoft.com/business/partners/
> Which one became extinct? Ass.
>
> You really shouldn't Drink & Write.
IS that 6 million MSDN subscribers? I would say there is more Linux
developers out there, that don't need the fancy $5000 mecharno kit to
prove to their mates that they can program. Oh, and btw, I have a SUN
developer connection subscription, and compared to the Microsoft shit,
it is worth every dollar, esp the support SUN provides, real engineers
helping programmers. Not the Microsoft help when you just have some
half witt reading out a help file to you.
Matthew Gardiner
--
I am the resident BOFH (Bastard Operator From Hell)
If you don't like it, you can go [# rm -rf /home/luser] yourself
Running SuSE Linux 7.1
The best of German engineering, now in software form
------------------------------
From: Matthew Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux needs a standard, user proof distro
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 22:16:34 +1200
Regarding MIPS and ALPHA, if you spent $15,000 on a SGI system, would
you downgrade from a 64bit IRIX to a 32bit Windows which is unproven? If
you spent $15,000 on an Alpha workstation would you downgrade your
system to running a 32bit OS on a 64bit CPU?
Matthew Gardiner
J Sloan wrote:
>
> Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
>
> > [snips]
> >
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >> > Now tell me what non x86 or x86 clone amchines Windows runs on. Or
> > >> > Solaris.
> > >>
> > >> Solaris runs on Sparc and on x86. Maybe more.
> > >>
> > >> Besides, Solaris is merely ONE member of the Unix family. If you want,
> > >> you can go to Sun's website and download Solaris for x86.
> > >>
> > >> http://www.sun.com/solaris/downloads.html
> > >>
> > >>
> > > You forgot to tell me what non-x86 or non-x86 clones WIndows works on.
> >
> > Alpha, for one. And MIPS.
>
> Both dead. MIPS dropped ms support awhile back,
> Alpha somewhat more recently.
>
> At one time, it was felt that windows "nt" was going
> to be big, but as reality set in and disillusionment
> with the marketplace took it's toll, all non-x86 h/w
> platforms dropped support for pc operating systems.
>
> jjs
--
I am the resident BOFH (Bastard Operator From Hell)
If you don't like it, you can go [# rm -rf /home/luser] yourself
Running SuSE Linux 7.1
The best of German engineering, now in software form
------------------------------
From: "Bobby D. Bryant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: fail in configuring LILO
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 04:24:18 +0600
scli wrote:
> when i try to configure lilo by the following command, error happens
>
> -> [root@ACEnet /root]# /sbin/lilo
> -> Warning: device 0x0303 exceeds 1024 cylinder limit
> -> Fatal: sector 29610212 too large for linear mode (try 'lba32'
> instead)
>
> Can anyone tell me what is the problem? and
> How can i configure lilo?
IANAExpert, but I think it's telling you to add the line 'lba32' to your
/etc/lilo.conf.
I also have a large drive, and the lba32 line was put into my lilo.conf
during installation:
boot=/dev/hda
map=/boot/map
install=/boot/boot.b
prompt
timeout=100
lba32
default=linux-ac6
# From the kernel.org tarball:
image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.3-ac6
label=linux-ac6
read-only
root=/dev/hda1
...
Good luck,
Bobby Bryant
Austin, Texas
------------------------------
From: "Pedro Coto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Col. Hack
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 20:29:54 +0200
> Well, all's fine and dandy if Windows supports your needs. But what if
> you want to do something with your computer that Bill and Company have
> decided you don't need to do? Guess what? You're Fucked!
Stupid argument. Just by recompiling your kernel you can just select
among the supported things at the source level.
> You can't recompile ANY Windows kernel to do ANYTHING! You're stuck
> with it, as-is.
Don't be confused. Compiling a kernel is a kind like installing a binary
patch or
a driver under Windows, so there is no need to recompile Windows kernel at
all.
> Bill decides you need copy-protection at the kernel level on your sound
> card? TOO BAD! That's what you get.
I bet that any kernel developer would easily be able to create either a
patch
or a driver for a Windows system, so again if something is not supported at
the kernel level, you're stuck too at GNU/Linux, that's what you get.
> Bill decides you shouldn't be able to make a Fair-Use copy of a DVD you
> bought? TOO BAD! Let me repeat: YOU CAN'T RECOMPILE ANY WINDOWS
> KERNEL. You CAN'T DO ANYTHING that Bill has decided you shouldn't be
> able to do.
False. There have been binary patches for Windows, as well as registry
tricks since
its creation. A good programmer can do it either under Windows or under
GNU/Linux,
it is just that under GNU/Linux he/she's got for free the development tools.
> Bill decides Windows is dropping support for your peripheral? Sorry!
> You lose.
What about he/they deciding to remove support for some things into
the kernel ? As an example, what about ipfwadm -> ipchains -> iptables ?
(I know iptables has backward compatibility with ipchains, although loosing
iptables new characteristics).
> Yes, Windows is easy. It's called *submission*.
No Windows is not as easy. It's called "trying to get computer nearer to
persons"; anyway ... learning GNU/Linux or Unix is not as difficult, it is
just called "time".
------------------------------
From: "Pedro Coto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Pete Goodwin is in good company
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 20:37:03 +0200
> Windows crashes, Windows isn't stable, but I see much worse with KDE.
Sure, using things like KDE or GNOME, really show the world how it is
not as easy as Unix people say to do a rich and full featured bomb proof
desktop, and show us how those two projects are following the Windows
path in some aspects, despite all the hate and supposed superiority people
claim for KDE or GNOME.
------------------------------
From: pip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Microsoft: Closed source is more secure
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 11:58:10 +0100
Chad Everett wrote:
>
> TCP/IP sequence number guessing was laughably easy on NT for YEARS.
> Microsoft knew it because it was reported to them very early on.
> They NEVER fixed it until W2K came out.
Didn't NT "borrow" the TCP/IP code base from someone? [read bsd]
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 07:16:01 -0400
From: Donn Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: To Eric FunkenBush
GreyCloud wrote:
> What for... I was providing this to a pubic forum to hear from others
> own experiences.
> You do have g++ don't you?? How about VC++6.0??
> Let the others decide how this works for them so that a determination
> can be made.
> Maybe VC++ has a switch that needs to be set.
Check this out:
$ g++ -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/2.95.2-6/specs
gcc version 2.95.2-6 19991024 (cygwin experimental)
$ uname -srm
CYGWIN_ME-4.90 1.1.8(0.34/3/2) i586
====== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ======
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
======= Over 80,000 Newsgroups = 16 Different Servers! ======
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roy Culley)
Subject: Re: More Mafia$oft incompetance on display..
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:41:03 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Kelsey Bjarnason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "The home page"? Just how many servers have they converted? If I'm
> reading what they're saying correctly, we're talking 5,000 servers to be
> converted over. 4 years? That's about 3 servers per day, ignoring any
> actual time spent planning, testing, etc.
They have only replaced the frontend web servers. The real work is
still handled by Unix
> Okay, smart boy, how long would it take _you_ to roll out a conversion of
> 5,000 servers from, say, IIS+Win2K to Apache + Linux, while maintaining
> service for 100 million users? Let's see your deployment strategy.
You wouldn't need 5,000 Unix servers. You wouldn't need 500 for goodness
sake. It says a lot about NT/W2K. Remember the recent artcle about a
company replacing a few IBM systems with 1,500 NT boxes? They had to go
back to IBM as NT couldn't cope.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roy Culley)
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Microsoft should be feared and despised
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 13:01:19 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Matthew Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Stephen S. Edwards II" wrote:
>>
>> Matthew Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> : Well, thats due to Aaron. Why the fuck should I spend half my time triming
>> : the post because of his (Aarons) supa-long sig. As you can see, I am now
>> : conforming to the rules...Don't beat me master, Don't beat me!
>>
>> : Matthew Gardiner
>>
>> : --
>> : Disclaimer:
>>
>> : I am the resident BOFH (Bastard Operator From Hell).
>>
>> : If you do not like it, go, "rm -rf /home/luser" yourself
>>
>> Lusers don't belong in /home... they belong in /tmp.
>>
>> And you call yourself a BOFH? *grin*
> I have a sybolic link from /tmp/luser into /home/luser to give them, the
> lusers, a false sense of security, hehehe.
I presume you meant a link from /home/luser to /tmp/luser or aren't
you a real BOFH afterall? :-)
And lets not forget that /tmp normally gets cleared out on a reboot
so better have a cron job to remove old files. Every couple of hours
should be enough. :-)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Grahame Kelly)
Subject: Re: Win4Lin + Win 3.1
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:11:04 GMT
>> Would Win4Lin run Windows 3.1?
Definetly NOT, I have tried and the win4lin site
also states it is not possible.
G.
--
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: 16 Apr 2001 12:14:01 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 14 Apr 2001 17:46:36 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>billh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>"T. Max Devlin"
>>>
>>>> >The truer translation is "You shall not murder". We've been through
>>>this.
>>>>
>>>> I thought it was "you shall not slay." How do you know which it is?
>>>
>>>Take your pick. Killing in war is neither illegal, unethical, nor immoral.
>>
>>And here�s something, in your own words that may clear why you are full
>>of odorous remainders of the digestive process:
>>
>>"killing in war is not illegal".
>>
>>a) That is not true in general
>>b) That requires some standard: "law" against which it can be declared
>> "legal" does it not?
>>
>>In 3000BC, the standard included massive rape of the women of the defeated
>>and mass sacrifices of the defeated soldiers.
>>
>
>Well that's not true at all. Show us an example in 3000BC where
>massive rape of the defeated women occurred. Since you throw
>out such blatantly false statements as fact, everything you
>say is questionable.
Ok, before I bother doing it: are you really saying that conquering
armies at and around 3000BC ddidn't do that?
Just as a sidenote, Cyrus of Persia was praised as a humane ruler for
forbidding that practice for his armies, and that was over 1500 years
later.
Perhaps you think they were more civilized back then?
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: 16 Apr 2001 12:16:09 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
billh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>"Roberto Alsina"
>
>> "killing in war is not illegal".
>>
>> a) That is not true in general
>> b) That requires some standard: "law" against which it can be declared
>> "legal" does it not?
>
>Correct. My nation lives by and under the rule of law.
Yet, that nation also defines its own laws.
And those laws were not in effect when the commandment was given.
>> In 3000BC, the standard included massive rape of the women of the defeated
>> and mass sacrifices of the defeated soldiers.
>
>And the "legal" standard today? Your debate wasn't that war 3000 years ago
>was wrong. I stand by my point.
Perhaps I need to stop assuming you gonna comprehend the connections.
Let's see: if the commandment allowed for the act of war, it must allow
for the act of was as it was understood at the time the commandment was
given.
Perhaps you believe the commandment allow the mass rape of the defeated?
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: 16 Apr 2001 12:17:21 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 14 Apr 2001 17:35:48 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On 12 Apr 2001 23:05:57 GMT, Joseph T. Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>In comp.os.linux.advocacy T. Max Devlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>: Said Joseph T. Adams in alt.destroy.microsoft on 12 Apr 2001 09:44:09
>>>:>In comp.os.linux.advocacy Russianbear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>:>
>>>:>: Bah - If there is a God he is no better than a common dictator and there is
>>>:>: NO reason at all to worship him. Anyone who says live by my rules or be
>>>:>: punished with death or eternal damnation is an asshole.
>>>:>
>>>:>
>>>:>First of all, God has only two main rules, according to Jesus. First
>>>:>is to love Him. Second is to love your neighbor.
>>>:>
>>>:>I don't think those are unreasonable requests.
>>>
>>>: Says who? According to God and Jesus (according to those who say
>>>: 'according to God and Jesus'), there were plenty of other rules, and
>>>: less reasonable requests.
>>>
>>>
>>>Those are details. They're there to explain exactly what is meant by
>>>loving God and loving your neighbor.
>>
>>How does eating fish on fridays connect to loving my neighbour?
>>
>
>You really have not idea what you're talking about, do you?
Well, ok, how about not eating meat with cheese?
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: 16 Apr 2001 12:19:25 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 14 Apr 2001 19:34:04 GMT, Joseph T. Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In comp.os.linux.advocacy Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>:>:>First of all, God has only two main rules, according to Jesus. First
>:>:>is to love Him. Second is to love your neighbor.
>:>:>
>:>:>I don't think those are unreasonable requests.
>:>
>:>: Says who? According to God and Jesus (according to those who say
>:>: 'according to God and Jesus'), there were plenty of other rules, and
>:>: less reasonable requests.
>:>
>:>
>:>Those are details. They're there to explain exactly what is meant by
>:>loving God and loving your neighbor.
>
>: How does eating fish on fridays connect to loving my neighbour?
>
>You may be confusing the teachings of a particular sect (the Roman
>Catholic Church) with those of Christ. They're not necessarily the
>same thing.
The sect says they are. There is no "teachings of Christ" that is
independent from sects, since the sects are the ones saying the
"teachings of christ" exists.
>: Roberto Alsina (who is not going to ask about how not fucking women
>: who want to do it implies love of God)
>
>
>You may be confusing lust with love. Those are almost never the same
>thing.
Hardly. I meant, how does repressing my lust implies love of God.
Two very different things, yet most sects claim there's a connection.
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: 16 Apr 2001 12:20:25 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
billh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>"Roberto Alsina"
>
>> How does eating fish on fridays connect to loving my neighbour?
>
>First, why don't you tell us all where in the Bible it states red meat can
>not be eaten on Fridays. Then I suggest you read Acts 10:9-16.
Who said I am a literallist?
Ok, how does drinking wine on sundays express my love for Christ?
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: 16 Apr 2001 12:22:58 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
billh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>"Roberto Alsina"
>
>> >Said billh in alt.destroy.microsoft on Thu, 12 Apr 2001 11:00:31 GMT;
>> >>"Roberto Alsina"
>> >>
>> >>> It doesn't surprise me at all that you are unclear that murder now and
>> >>> murder three thousand years ago don't mean the same thing.
>> >>
>> >>ROFLMAO!!!!
>> >
>> >What's funny?
>>
>> Perhaps murder is funny to him.
>
>Perhaps it's because murder is murder, whether 3000 years ago or today.
If by murder you mean "murder as defined today", indeed it is the same
at any time.
However, you are using "murder as defined today" as translation for a
hebrew word that you say means "murder". I say that "murder" is "murder
as defined thousands of years ago" and that even if both words mean
murder, the meaning of the word has changed in between.
>Murder is not simply defined by the result (the death), but also by the
>intent.
And by whether it's lawful or not.
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: 16 Apr 2001 12:24:59 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
billh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>"Roberto Alsina"
>
>> I would state something I don�t know to be false.
>
>Then you don't know it to be true.
Duh.
>When you use something you don't know to
>be true as a point in convincing another, you ought make that it clear that
>you don't know the point to be true or false. Then again, that would simply
>weaken your case.
Well, you are obviously not a mathematician. Ever heard of "reductio ad
absurdum" ?
>>Do you go around in christmas telling all kids
>> Santa doesn�t exist, and showing satellite pictures of the north pole?
>
>You aren't a child, are you?
No, but if you believe the bible is the revealed word of god, you are in
the same position as childs who believe in santa, in a way.
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: "ja" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Who can help me?
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 20:31:42 +0800
I face a problem about compile.
%cc -o AppTest AppTest.c
AppTest.c: In function 'Attempt Connection':
AppTest.c:253: in compatible type for argument 2 of 'connect'
AppTest.c: In function 'GetReturnStatus':
AppTest.c:storage size of 'readFds' isn't known.
Do you know what's wrong?
Below is my program.
#include <errno.h>
#include <sys/errno.h>
#include <sys/param.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <netdb.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
/* include files needed for "herror ()" call */
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <arpa/nameser.h>
#include <resolv.h>
int AttemptConnection (ConnectionStatus)
int *ConnectionStatus;
{
int Socket, I;
struct sockaddr_in ServerAddr;
Socket = stream_socket_info.Socket;
ServerAddr = stream_socket_info.Addr;
//AppTest.c:253: in compatible type for argument 2 of 'connect'
// compile tell me ServerAddr have something wrong . why???
// How to modify ?
if (connect (Socket, ServerAddr, sizeof (struct sockaddr_in)) == ERROR)
{
if (errno == ECONNREFUSED)
{
perror ("INFO - Attempting connection to server ");
close (Socket);
if (CreateStreamSocket(I) == ERROR) return(ERROR);
}
else
{
perror ("FATAL ERROR - Attempting connection to server ");
return (ERROR);
}
}
else
{
printf ("Successful connection to %s\n", stream_socket_info.HostName);
*ConnectionStatus = CONNECTED;
return (NO_ERROR);
}
*ConnectionStatus = NOT_CONNECTED;
return (NO_ERROR);
}
int GetReturnStatus ()
{
int BytesRead;
int selectCount;
//AppTest.c:storage size of 'readFds' isn't known.
//How to modify?
struct fd_set readFds;
struct timeval timeLimit;
timeLimit.tv_sec = TIME_OUT;
timeLimit.tv_usec = 0;
FD_ZERO (&readFds);
FD_SET (stream_socket_info.Socket, &readFds);
printf("WAITING FOR RESPONSE.....\n");
selectCount = select (FD_SETSIZE, &readFds, NULL,NULL, &timeLimit);
if (selectCount == ERROR)
{
printf ("FATAL ERROR - select failed in GetReturnStatus.\n");
return (ERROR);
}
if (selectCount == 0)
{
printf ("FATAL ERROR - Time out occured in GetReturnStatus.\n");
return (ERROR);
}
if ((BytesRead =
read (stream_socket_info.Socket, &control_message, BUFLEN)) ==
ERROR)
{
perror ("FATAL ERROR - GetReturnStatus (read).\n");
return (ERROR);
}
if (BytesRead < BUFLEN)
{
printf ("FATAL ERROR - Read from socket incomplete!!! \n");
return (ERROR);
}
printf ("%s for %s \n", control_message.Buffer1, WscStationId);
}
Thank you!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
