Linux-Advocacy Digest #710, Volume #33 Thu, 19 Apr 01 21:13:06 EDT
Contents:
Re: Who votes for Sliverdick to be executed: AYEs:10 NAYS:0 (1 ABSTAIN)
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Who votes for Sliverdick to be executed: AYEs:3 NAYS:0 (1 ABSTAIN) ("Aaron R.
Kulkis")
Re: Who votes for Sliverdick to be executed: AYEs:3 NAYS:0 (1 ABSTAIN) ("Aaron R.
Kulkis")
Re: Pete Goodwin is in good company (Roy Culley)
Re: What's the point (GreyCloud)
Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Who votes for Sliverdick to be executed: AYEs:10 NAYS:0 (1 ABSTAIN)
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 17:45:40 -0700
"Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
>
> "Gunner �" wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 18 Apr 2001 00:55:07 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >"Gunner �" wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, 17 Apr 2001 15:08:44 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Hehehehhehe
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I'm not registered to vote in this precinct, but since I'm a registered
> > >> >> Democrat does that matter? <G>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >Since Democrats don't care about such niceties, you are allowed
> > >> >to vote AYE in the election, regardless of where you live.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> In fact Sue... you can even vote more than once. Feel free to fill out
> > >> the form in your hometown, and again while visiting Fresno.
> > >>
> > >
> > >In the spirit of the Democrat Party, I'll make that 5 AYEs for Sue
> > >4 in her home town, and one in Fresno.
> > >
> > >
> > >AYE: 9
> > >NAY: 0
> > >ABSTAIN: 1
> > >
> > >When, oh when, will Professor Erb come to rescue his beloved Sliverdick?
> > >
> > oooh oooh! We now have enough for a fireing party! YAY. Now who brings
> > the steaks?
>
> Not quite. Sue, being the good Democrat that she is, observered
> her party's traditional voting methods, and casted 5 ballots.
Considering how I voted in the last election I don't think the Democrats
would think I'm so "good".
Sue
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Who votes for Sliverdick to be executed: AYEs:3 NAYS:0 (1 ABSTAIN)
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 20:47:36 -0400
Martin McPhillips wrote:
>
> Rob Robertson wrote:
> >
> > Martin McPhillips wrote:
> > >
> > > Rob Robertson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Aaron> I think Sliverdick should be made to serve as an example to all
>others
> > > > > Aaron> who believe in his idiotic shit.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, by mocking his views and exposing his lies.
> > > > >
> > > > > Killing him for his ideas, as you advocate, is the
> > > > > act of a totalitarian, which you have often shown
> > > > > signs of.
> > > >
> > > > Aaron is not advocating killing Yeadon *directly* for his
> > > > ideas, Andrew; he's putting Glen in a position of evaluating
> > > > a system (pure democracy) that rejects inherent individual
> > > > rights and uphold political, mass-derived rights. If Glen
> > > > supports the 'will of the people' then it stands that any
> > > > system that rejects his just claim to his own life allows
> > > > a 'vote' as to whether or not Glen continues living.
> > > >
> > > > It's a valid point (even though I've chosen not to join
> > > > in the voting) because, as Aaron *implies* in his example,
> > > > the rejection of inherent individual rights will lead
> > > > inexorably to a vote on who lives and who dies. Kulkis
> > > > (and Glenworthy) both tacitly reject totalitarianism
> > > > in this thread.
> > >
> > > How could anyone suggest that this poor young
> > > man be executed--
> > >
> > > http://www.spiritone.com/~gdy52150/abrose.htm
> > >
> > > Is there any doubt that Glenn D. Yeadon's photograph
> > > betrays a solemn, thoughtful, sincere borderline
> > > mentally retarded upstanding citizen?
> >
> > That requires a warning label, Martin. Shame on you.
>
> What do you mean, Rob? I feel about that handsome
> young man the way I would about a son. How could
> I possibly sit idly by while people vote on his
> execution? Whenever I see him responding to others
> with something like--
>
> "yer lying fascist fuckwit quisling liar, cant ansewer
> my facts, pay me my money, fucwit, ya lost the bet."
>
> --I know that he means well. Why can't others show a
> little patience with him? Do we rush the infirm? In time,
> as he has more exposure to others through mainstreaming,
> Glenn will learn to cope with his, ah, deficits, and
I think Glenn would learn respect for his betters (i.e. the
productive, WORKING people of the world) if he were looking
down the barrel of several guns, being aimed at him by a
few of those very same working people.
It's amazing how quickly even an idiot like Sliverdick can learn
when his life depends on it.
> will master a few basic skills and who will know the
> difference? Why, if you just look at that photograph and
> imagine him in a maroon uniform with epaulets and a faux
> military hat, he could be the doorman in any NYC apartment
> building (and those fellas have a union, ya lyin fascist
> quisling).
>
> Give Glenn time. Don't execute him. Let him live.
>
> Better yet, let him live with Scott and Nasty in
> Augusta!
>
> >
> > As far as Glen's "White Rose" website is concerned, I'm
> > a bit perplexed that a search of "Nazi Hydra" on Google
> > only shows a couple dozen hits, and the vast majority of
> > them are Glen spamming several political newsgroups and
> > getting *zero* response. If you're curious, here's the
> > search,...
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22Nazi+Hydra%22&btnG=Search&meta=site%3Dgroups
> >
> > ...and for kicks you could click on 'view thread' to see
> > noone (apart from the neo-Nazi Vange) responding to it.
> > The few times it appears in an ongoing thread is when I
> > was contrasting Glen's call for nationalizing/naturalizing
> > California's energy industry with other fascist calls to
> > nationalize industries.
> >
> > Doesn't seem like much of a 'liberal resource', does it?
> >
> > _
> > Rob
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Who votes for Sliverdick to be executed: AYEs:3 NAYS:0 (1 ABSTAIN)
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 20:49:32 -0400
Rob Robertson wrote:
>
> Martin McPhillips wrote:
> >
> > Rob Robertson wrote:
> > >
> > > Martin McPhillips wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Rob Robertson wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Aaron> I think Sliverdick should be made to serve as an example to all
>others
> > > > > > Aaron> who believe in his idiotic shit.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, by mocking his views and exposing his lies.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Killing him for his ideas, as you advocate, is the
> > > > > > act of a totalitarian, which you have often shown
> > > > > > signs of.
> > > > >
> > > > > Aaron is not advocating killing Yeadon *directly* for his
> > > > > ideas, Andrew; he's putting Glen in a position of evaluating
> > > > > a system (pure democracy) that rejects inherent individual
> > > > > rights and uphold political, mass-derived rights. If Glen
> > > > > supports the 'will of the people' then it stands that any
> > > > > system that rejects his just claim to his own life allows
> > > > > a 'vote' as to whether or not Glen continues living.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's a valid point (even though I've chosen not to join
> > > > > in the voting) because, as Aaron *implies* in his example,
> > > > > the rejection of inherent individual rights will lead
> > > > > inexorably to a vote on who lives and who dies. Kulkis
> > > > > (and Glenworthy) both tacitly reject totalitarianism
> > > > > in this thread.
> > > >
> > > > How could anyone suggest that this poor young
> > > > man be executed--
> > > >
> > > > http://www.spiritone.com/~gdy52150/abrose.htm
> > > >
> > > > Is there any doubt that Glenn D. Yeadon's photograph
> > > > betrays a solemn, thoughtful, sincere borderline
> > > > mentally retarded upstanding citizen?
> > >
> > > That requires a warning label, Martin. Shame on you.
> >
> > What do you mean, Rob?
>
> I mean that not everyone has the full reservoir of charity
> and compassion that you do that allows you to empathize with
> the plight of this poor soul and look past the superficial
> "FBIs 10 Most Wanted List" appearance in that photo.
>
> I'm only thinking of the children, after all.
>
> > I feel about that handsome
> > young man the way I would about a son. How could
> > I possibly sit idly by while people vote on his
> > execution? Whenever I see him responding to others
> > with something like--
> >
> > "yer lying fascist fuckwit quisling liar, cant ansewer
> > my facts, pay me my money, fucwit, ya lost the bet."
> >
> > --I know that he means well. Why can't others show a
> > little patience with him? Do we rush the infirm? In time,
> > as he has more exposure to others through mainstreaming,
> > Glenn will learn to cope with his, ah, deficits, and
> > will master a few basic skills and who will know the
> > difference? Why, if you just look at that photograph and
> > imagine him in a maroon uniform with epaulets and a faux
> > military hat, he could be the doorman in any NYC apartment
> > building (and those fellas have a union, ya lyin fascist
> > quisling).
> >
> > Give Glenn time. Don't execute him. Let him live.
> >
> > Better yet, let him live with Scott and Nasty in
> > Augusta!
>
> Road trip! I'm thinkin' maybe all the compassionate people
> (like me and you) could start a little fund to charter a bus
> from California to Oklahoma to South Dakota to Maine.
>
> What did you call it? The Edmond Witch Project?
I wonder if "professor" Scott Erb would be willing to put
his money where his mouth is, and let Sliverdick the
welfare-bum move into his nice college-professor's house.
---not holding my breath.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roy Culley)
Subject: Re: Pete Goodwin is in good company
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 01:56:24 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Matthew Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Matthew Gardiner wrote:
>>
>> Give the memory test ago, should only take around 30 minutes. oh, btw,
>> I couldn't be bothered upgrading to KDE 2.1, maybe that could be the
>> problem?
>>
> Yet no reply for 2 days. hmm, Pete is suffering from the typical luser
> syndrom called "It ain't fucking work'in, but I won't do anything about
> it". I offer a suggest, but no, that would mean that his problem is
> solve, thus, nothing to bitch about, and as a result, poor old Pete
> would have nothing to bitch about.
As PG has stated on numerous occasions he isn't looking for help. He
just wants to point out how crap any Linux distribution is. The problems
are clearly somewhere between the keyboard and the chair.
------------------------------
From: GreyCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: What's the point
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 17:54:18 -0700
pookoopookoo wrote:
>
> > It just isn't so. Those same features that make Linux great, also make
> Windows
> > gurus nuts because it works completely different. It works better than
> both
> > NT/2k and DOS/Windows, just different.
>
> I think you meant to say "It DOESN'T work better/worse than both NT/2k and
> DOS/Windows, just different."
>
> That I'll believe. I have Redhat 6.0 installed and I find X crashes a hell
> of a lot more than windows as a whole. Trivial things (like making symlinks
> fer christ's sake) will bring gnome to a screeching halt. I seem to have
> traded "ctrl-alt-delete" for "ctrl-alt-backspace", only with way uglier UI
> graphics and no games =(
>
> X is not a stable environment, and in my case the windowing system IS the
> OS. I'm sorry to say.
>
Nope. X is a server. The gui is the client. This ain't windows.
Linux is the O/S.
More than likely, you should go to pcpitstop.com and try to test your
hardware first.
You can hang X by having your video card not responding like it should.
I had RH6.0 and it never crashed. On that computer I was using ECC
memory and ATI video.
Right now I'm running Sun O/S using X with an ATI video. No crashes
here either.
> I'm a graphic designer by trade, not a programmer. I find linux VERY user
> unfriendly. I have yet to find something to do on it that I can't do easier,
> faster and more reliably in windows (and even, to a lesser degree, MacOS 9).
> I'm used to photoshop, illustrator and quark...Gimp, killustrator and latex
> are VERY poor substitutes...=(
If you're a grahpic designer you should be real happy with SGI IRIX
systems.
You want speed? Use these.
The apps is just a matter of your mental approach to a problem. The
UNIX apps work differently but do get the job done. Wait until Mac OS X
gets their apps up and running, and you'll see what I mean. Things will
work differently than what you are used to... you just have to go thru
retraining is all.
>
> I'd use a free OS if I could. I love the principle behind Linux (that's the
> liberal commie in me speaking =).
:-)
--
V
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.singles,alt.linux,alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 21:03:17 -0400
Nomen Nescio wrote:
>
> Tomaz Cedilnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Soro wrote:
> >
> > > So one the one hand you have the technically aware user who can compile
> > > their own kernel on their homebuilt box while on the other you have the
> > > great unwashed that definately could not (and never will) handle having to
> > > manually edit myriads of files and crap all over the place just to get
> > > filesharing working. They either are not technically minded or they simply
> > > can't be buggered putting the time in to learn how as they have other
> > > things they'd like to do with their lives. I mean, just because you want to
> > > buy and drive a car doesn't mean you'll have to know how to tune it or
> > > rebuild the transmission yourself.
> >
> > You take the car on service for that. Or if you want to upgrade the
> > transmision.
> >
> > Why wouldn't a user take his Linux machines on service when he wants
> > upgrade the kernel or install some software? Why would they only do that
> > for hardware problems? (As some experienced users add a card or change a
> > harddisk themselves, other experienced users would upgrade the kernel
> > themselves.)
>
> because it would cost them more than they paid for thier machine in the
> first place
> ya retard
Actually, since Linux can be administrated remotely, there's no reason
for the machine to be taken in...and most things can be solved within
a few minutes' time...which, even at the high hourly rates that Unix
administration skills are worth...is STILL cheaper to solve than a
LoseDOS problem
Hope that helps.
Jackie...for someone who claims to be an independant thinker, and really
up on the latest news, you really cling to some very, very old lies that
all originate from the ultimate in "borg"-like orgainizations...Mafia$oft.
> jackie 'anakin' tokeman
>
> men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth - more than ruin,
> more even than death
> - bertrand russell
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
