On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:39:17 +1100 Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well I'd say just don't worry about the runtime test either. > It is only a small amount of dead code on PTRS_PER_XXX == 1 > architectures, and a special enough case that I think that is > OK. > > So I'd say just remove the check entirely. If someone really > cares, they can do the crazy macro! Okie dokie. I've added that to my set of changes to get sparc64 using 4-level page tables.
