David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For example, replacing TASK_SIZE in fs/namei.c with "thread->addr_limit" > > would actually clean up the code: it would mean that the games with > > "get_fs()" etc would just go away, to be replaced with something like > > I think that looks nice too. > > Would you be against a "mm->addr_limit"? That's what an approach > by Paulus implemented, and I was in the camp supporting that kind > of direction.
On the other hand, this value is constant on some archs, and in those cases, wouldn't it be better for it to be a compile-time constant? David
