On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 23:15:36 -0500 James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, Matthew Wilcox suggested an alternative: If the inline > function arguments for the size are consts, then the compiler seems to > behave correctly, so how about the attached? That looks perfectly reasonable. BTW, the second hunk isn't needed in Linus's current tree which has that include fix already :-)
