On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:02:18PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > Could you verify that the addition of the consts to the inline function > > size arguments (previously posted patch) fixes this? If so, I'll send > > the patch on. > > FWIW, adding consts doesn't help gcc-3.0. I don't have a problem with > forcing people to upgrade from 3.0 to 3.3, I just wanted to be sure > everyone's aware of the problem.
3.0 has been a significant source of trouble on MIPS. Fortunately 3.0 and 3.1 seems to have died out already so I don't need to force anybody :) Ralf
