On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:16:19PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > glibc probably doesn't use the new sys_shmat() syscall yet - it's a > relatively recent addition, so I think we have the opportunity to fix > it if needs be. > > However, I don't know the glibc sources well enough to comment on the > state of play there. And what's more, I don't know any active ARM > glibc folk to ask about it. Sorry. > > (For the record, I've never been interested in glibc myself, and I've > always hoped that there would be someone else to look after that side > of things. However, it appears that this stance hasn't really resulted > in a long lasting ARM glibc effort. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see > _any_ signs out there which indicate otherwise.)
Since you already kept me on the cc list ;-) ARM libc seems to use the good old wrapper syscall. Ralf
