On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 01:05:01 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:03:12 +0100 Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Umm. I think you've just discovered a bug in ARM and MIPS. I don't see > > any code in glibc for handling the 4-argument version of sys_shmat. > > Russell, Ralf, could you comment? > > OK, assuming that using the 4 argument version of sys_shmat as a system > call, here is another version of the patch (not tested) for comment.
I have now built that patch on ppc64, i386 and x86_64 with and without CONFIG_SYSVIPC and booted it on ppc64. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
pgp8y0IY6lhAQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
