On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 13:36 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > That's an excellent point. > > Guys, architecture maintainers need test suites to verify that the syscalls > actually work as they wire them up. Please share. A stable URL would be > preferred - something which can go into the changlog or conceivably into > the kernel source.
http://david.woodhou.se/sigmasking.c is a good one for testing sigsuspend after hooking up TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK stuff and the generic sys_rt_sigsuspend(), although it's not actually my code. There were a bunch of other tests in a tarball with that (on linux-arch a year or two ago) which arch maintainers should also use occasionally when they play with signal or ptrace code. When I get back home I'll tidy up and publish the hacks I used for testing pselect() and ppoll() so that those can be tested without actually rebuilding glibc. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
