> > Are you sure it's even working? I implemented TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK > > for x86-64 and the SEGV part of the test fails. But it even fails > > without any of my patches applied, so if it's really broken > > it was always like this. I suspect i would have heard if such > > a fundamental thing was really broken on x86-64. > > It fails similarly on sparc. > > Signal stacks and SA_ONSTACK are not a very well tested feature, and I > think that is playing a part in this.
Failed with a lot of errors on s390 too. Strange enough it works well after if implemented TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK. Worse things could happen :) Heiko - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
