Russell King wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 07:17:16PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
All I'm saying is that we can easily wait a few days until arch
maintainers have had a chance to comment (you didn't think you
were missing anything last time, either).
We can afford to be a little bit careful about changing user APIs.
The new numbers only appeared very recently for ARM (iow, came in
with this mornings git update), so changing them sooner rather than
later would be preferred - cuts down the number of potential kernel
patches/tarballs which have the "wrong" numbers.
I just mean, to get an agreement (or at least nobody complaining)
before renumbering it again.
I don't think it should be too much of a problem unless it hits 2.6.16
(2.6.16-rc4 would be undesirable too I guess).
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
