On Friday 30 June 2006 15:04, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 14:44 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Friday 30 June 2006 14:26, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > it has been a few weeks since the s390 kconfig discussion died down. > > > I have put together a new patch that includes all of the suggestions > > > made so far. With this patch "make allyesconfig" and "make allmodconfig" > > > now works on s390. > > > > > > Please check that it does not break anything on your favorite > > > architecture. It really shouldn't but you never know. I want to push > > > this patch soon. > > > > I must say I still hate the negative !S390. It would be much better > > to define something positive. If PCI doesn't work maybe something > > else. > > Well, I don't like these negative !S390 depends as well. But I can't > help it, there is no other existing config symbol that can be used for a > positive dependency. Hardware that is built into the machine and is not > attached via some kind of bus does not have any dependency.
But one can be invented. DESKTOP_HARDWARE SMALL_IRON END_USER_PCI ... Chose one. What stops users from plugging a PCI sound card into your PCI slots BTW? Initially it can be set dependent on !S390 and then later migrated into all the architectures (you can probably recruit someone on l-k to do it if you don't want to do it yourself ...) -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
