On Friday 30 June 2006 15:28, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 15:09 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > I must say I still hate the negative !S390. It would be much better > > > > to define something positive. If PCI doesn't work maybe something > > > > else. > > > > > > Well, I don't like these negative !S390 depends as well. But I can't > > > help it, there is no other existing config symbol that can be used for a > > > positive dependency. Hardware that is built into the machine and is not > > > attached via some kind of bus does not have any dependency. > > > > > > But one can be invented. > > > > DESKTOP_HARDWARE > > SMALL_IRON > > END_USER_PCI > > ... > > > > Chose one. > > None of them seems appropriate. The things the patch deactives for s390 > are vastly different (ATA/IDE, Parallel port, Plug and Play, I2C, I2O > and so on). You will end up adding a lot of new config options.
ATA/IDE, parallel port, PNP could be PC_STYLE_HARDWARE. I2O should be definitely PCI I2C is an oddball. > > What stops users from plugging a PCI sound card into your PCI slots > > BTW? > > Which PCI slot? s390 doesn't have PCI slots. Ah I thought it had. If not you can just make most of that stuff dependent on PCI, no? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
