On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 11:10:53 +0200
Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 10:41 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Even better would be to teach the Kconfig sytem about this, so in
> > arch/s390/Kconfig we do
> >
> > disable VT
> >
> > and the Kconfig system knows not to offer VT, so there's no need to go
> > adding `depends on !DISABLE_foo' all over the place. The above DISABLE_foo
> > convention just simulates that missing feature.
>
> That would be a very useful feature to have. There are some border cases
> where no real positive dependency exist. For that a "disable xxx" would
> be perfect. But we still should use positive dependencies where possible
> to keep the disable lists short.
>
I don't understand that.
depends on !DISABLE_FOO
is short?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
