On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 02:20 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > That would be a very useful feature to have. There are some border cases > > where no real positive dependency exist. For that a "disable xxx" would > > be perfect. But we still should use positive dependencies where possible > > to keep the disable lists short. > > > > I don't understand that. > > depends on !DISABLE_FOO > > is short?
I was after the options that can be dealt with an existing positive dependency, e.g. "depends on PCI", or "depends on ISA". I have a handful of these in my patch. -- blue skies, Martin. Martin Schwidefsky Linux for zSeries Development & Services IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
